Re: [ProofPower] pp-contrib

2010-04-13 Thread Phil Clayton
Rob Arthan wrote: On 12/04/2010 16:19, Phil Clayton wrote: Roger Bishop Jones wrote: ... Perhaps one directory for "maths_eq"-like contributions, one for contributions in the form of patches: What kind of patches are you envisaging? Do you have any examples in mind? (I'm not sure if that w

Re: [ProofPower] pp-contrib

2010-04-12 Thread Rob Arthan
Dear All, Many thanks to Roger for making pp-contrib happen. For reasons that I do not understand, the following reply to Phil's last post arrived in the mailing list with "** SPAM **" in the subject line. It is in the archive, but I expect it won't have got to many subscribers. So I am tryin

Re: [ProofPower] pp-contrib

2010-04-12 Thread Roger Bishop Jones
I have set up a project at google. It is called pp-contrib uses mercurial and is under GPL2. The project description currently has three uses which we have discussed, but it sounds like Rob doesn't like the idea of this project hosting Phil's reuse of code-base ideas (if I understand them both

Re: [ProofPower] pp-contrib

2010-04-12 Thread Roger Bishop Jones
On Monday 12 Apr 2010 16:19, Phil Clayton wrote: > That sounds flexible enough. Does this all go into one > repository? (I don't know what is possible or most > suitable using Mercurial on google code.) Well I don't know enough about mercurial so I am relying on Rob to say if we are proposin

Re: [ProofPower] pp-contrib

2010-04-12 Thread Phil Clayton
Roger Bishop Jones wrote: ... We could have one directory for such things, with subdirectories for each "contribution" and some rules for these to permit a uniform and simple way of installing whatever selection a user wants to make use of, and then have different top level directories for t

Re: [ProofPower] pp-contrib

2010-04-07 Thread Roger Bishop Jones
On Wednesday 07 Apr 2010 14:05, Phil Clayton wrote: > Roger, > > This sounds like a good idea. As I understand it, this > would be primarily intended for things built on top of > ProofPower, e.g. new theories, but wouldn't exclude > projects that contain the entire OpenProofPower source > cod

Re: [ProofPower] pp-contrib

2010-04-07 Thread Phil Clayton
Roger, This sounds like a good idea. As I understand it, this would be primarily intended for things built on top of ProofPower, e.g. new theories, but wouldn't exclude projects that contain the entire OpenProofPower source code base if, for example, they need lower-level integration with Pr