Re: [prosody-dev] Is it possible to use anonymous access of Prosody to implement live help?

2015-12-17 Thread Thijs Alkemade
Hi Ying, I don't know how Jappix works, but one approach to live help systems is to create a new MUC (with a randomly generated name [1]) when a user requests the help and then send invitations to the people who can offer help. Once one person has accepted the invitation the user is informed that

Re: [prosody-dev] Result packet not forwarded from BOSH to Smack client

2015-10-29 Thread Thijs Alkemade
Hi Pawel, You did not mention this, but from the log I’m concluding that the s are routed through a MUC. Could it be that there are multiple instances of the same bare JID behind one nick in the MUC? I think there can some unexpected results when routing s in Prosody when that happens (like a

Re: [prosody-dev] How does internal_hashed auth backend work for new users?

2015-10-23 Thread Thijs Alkemade
> On 23 okt. 2015, at 13:59, Pa He wrote: > > Hi Thijs > > Yes, this indeed helps: i got it working: > > key = OpenSSL::PKCS5.pbkdf2_hmac_sha1(pass, salt, iter, 20).unpack('H*')[0] > => "a71aacc618c164ccf3efd2ae23b0061919844909" > > Gives me the correct saltedpass. >

Re: [prosody-dev] How does internal_hashed auth backend work for new users?

2015-10-22 Thread Thijs Alkemade
> On 22 okt. 2015, at 18:21, Pa He wrote: > > Hi Thijs > > Thanks for your response. I see this wiki page seems to be the source of > http://stackoverflow.com/questions/29298346/xmpp-sasl-scram-sha1-authentication/29299946#29299946 > > Here is my console output: > >

Re: [prosody-dev] How does internal_hashed auth backend work for new users?

2015-10-19 Thread Thijs Alkemade
On 19 okt. 2015, at 13:40, Thijs Alkemade <m...@thijsalkema.de> wrote: > >> >> On 19 okt. 2015, at 08:26, Pa He <pat.herzf...@gmail.com> wrote: >> >> I'm having problems implementing the internal_hashed procedures in ruby. My >> setup is the followi

Re: [prosody-dev] How does internal_hashed auth backend work for new users?

2015-10-19 Thread Thijs Alkemade
> On 19 okt. 2015, at 08:26, Pa He wrote: > > I'm having problems implementing the internal_hashed procedures in ruby. My > setup is the following: > > I have a public-facing prosody 9.3 which does not allow inband registration. > I'm writing a Ruby on Rails App >

Re: [prosody-dev] is it lua 5.1 really required for Prosody .9.8?

2015-08-14 Thread Thijs Alkemade
On 14 aug. 2015, at 00:16, b...@cogs.com wrote: I working through installing Prosody and I really like it so far. I have a set-up that seems to be installed but when I try launch prosody I receive the message that I have lua 5.2 installed and lua 5.1 is required. My question is can I