-Original Message-
From: Ian Wilson [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: Thursday, March 11, 2004 1:17 AM
To: Protel EDA Forum
Subject: Re: [PEDA] The road to DXP, one mans story, warning
long post, (was)2004 DXP Looks Great,
also long reply - generally in agreement with John.
On
-Original Message-
From: Ian Wilson [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: Thursday, March 11, 2004 1:17 AM
To: Protel EDA Forum
Subject: Re: [PEDA] The road to DXP, one mans story, warning
long post, (was)2004 DXP Looks Great,
also long reply - generally in agreement with John.
On
Is driving a car more complex and difficult (higher processing load) than
riding a horse? Why do most of us not use horses to get about? Why did
we
(the community collectively) decide to skill-up and learn to drive a car?
So we can get places faster, basically. (Come on Ivan I am sure you
-Original Message-
From: Ian Wilson [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: Wednesday, March 10, 2004 1:49 AM
To: Protel EDA Forum
Subject: Re: [PEDA] 2004 DXP Looks Great,
On 12:16 PM 10/03/2004, DUTTON Phil said:
Bill,
My DXP is still in
the box.
..snip..
snipped
Some
After reading the many comments concerning DXP since it has come out it
appears that the general consensus is that after a few more years of
improvements they'll have hopefully recreated Protel 99SE. I know that
many of the engineers I work with have tried DXP and given up in disgust,
or at
also long reply - generally in agreement with John.
On 12:21 AM 11/03/2004, John A. Ross [Design] said:
..snip..
Ian
If I try to be objective I still have issues with DXP, and not just
because I was in transition to DXP from 99SE, but also the changes
required in work practices. But I keep trying
