Re: [PEDA] PEDA] P99SE Annotation

[Igor Gmitrovic]

It should work if the default designator is set int the sch library, e.g 10? for 
resistors or 20? for capacitors. Default designator is treated as a prefix and should 
not change when annotating.

Igor

-Original Message-
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: Friday, 1 August 2003 6:31 PM
To: Protel EDA Forum
Subject: Re: [PEDA] PEDA] P99SE Annotation



But I don't think this will distinguish between Rs, Cs, Ds, etc.. as
Adeline needs.
Robert



   
   
  Igor Gmitrovic 
   
  [EMAIL PROTECTED]To:   Protel EDA Forum [EMAIL 
PROTECTED]  
  om.au   cc: 
   
   Subject:  Re: [PEDA] PEDA] P99SE 
Annotation
  31-Jul-2003 11:41
   
  PM   
   
  Please respond to
   
  Protel EDA  
   
  Forum   
   
   
   
   
   




Adeline,

go to Tools-Annotate(untick Current Sheet Only box)-Advanced Options and
set a range for designators on each sheet in the project. We usually set
top level sheet to the range of 0-99 and then child sheet 1 to 100-199,
child sheet 2 to 200-299, second level child sheet 1 to 1000-1999, second
level child sheet 2 to 2000-2999, etc.

Regards,

Igor

-Original Message-
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: Wednesday, 30 July 2003 6:45 PM
To: Protel EDA Forum
Subject: [PEDA] PEDA] P99SE Annotation


Hi

My company uses an internal designator naming standard for schematic
symbols. The standard is such that each type of component is assigned a
prefix and each designator will be 4 digits long, eg. 1st resistor: 1001,
2nd resistor: 1002, 25th capacitor: 2025, 54th diode, 3054, etc.

Is there anyway I can get P99SE to generate this automatically? I
understand that it can only do 11, 12, etc, and not 1001, 1002, etc.
Furthermore if I reset the designators, the prefix number gets wiped out
as well.

Thanks for answering my question.

Adeline










* * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * *
* To post a message: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
*
* To leave this list visit:
* http://www.techservinc.com/protelusers/leave.html
*
* Contact the list manager:
* mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
*
* Forum Guidelines Rules:
* http://www.techservinc.com/protelusers/forumrules.html
*
* Browse or Search previous postings:
* http://www.mail-archive.com/[EMAIL PROTECTED]
* * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * *

Re: [PEDA] Analysing...

[Brad Velander]

Still running Win98 as you had stated in your earlier messages? That would be the most 
common reason for your crashes if you are still running Win98. 99SE SP6 will run quite 
stably on WIN2000 Pro. Pretty stable NT4.
 
Sincerely,
Brad Velander

-Original Message- 
From: Choong Keat Yian [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] 
Sent: Sat 02/08/2003 5:49 AM 
To: Protel EDA Forum 
Cc: 
Subject: Re: [PEDA] Analysing...



You know , i have have my own confusion both self afflicted and for using 
Protel.,Since i join this company i has been told to use Protel but the fact is that 
it seem to me Protel's old and new version do not alleviate anything much other than 
cosmetic and workaround change as the main sunject matter.Imagine all the feature it 
got but some is quite unusable for what it intended to be,and i still didnt know why 
my Protel 99SE with service pack 6 still crash even thought i have 256 mb ram on a 
Asus board with Pentium 4 at 2.4Ghz.It happen on multiple machines both new and old 
and i dont think the problem is with the Nvidia's graphic engine.

Choong



-jg¬±¨™¨¥¶Šk¢y¢»¦µç!±êïŠw¢dè•æ¯zØb²X¬¶ø¬ŠØm¶ŸÿÃ
-yÈlz»âÇ(›úk¢º³ù^j÷¡¶iB¢{ZrÛazX¬¶f§j«™¨¥¶h®é€vh§ŠËkjÚ+Mç!Iêïw¢ah®'^–)¥zÈm¶ŸÿÃ
-yÈlz»âÇ(›úk¢º³÷è®W¬†º0±ê+Iæ«rkzø¨ºÊh²‚Èm¶ŸÿÃ
j)Z­Èb½ç(›úk¢y¢»¦µç!±êïŠw¢