Re: [PEDA] Updating Sheet Symbols

2001-08-24 Thread Brian Guralnick
ginal Message - From: "Ian Wilson" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> To: "Protel EDA Forum" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> Sent: Friday, August 24, 2001 12:36 AM Subject: Re: [PEDA] Updating Sheet Symbols | On 05:19 PM 23/08/2001 -0700, John Williams said: | >Take a look at: | &

Re: [PEDA] Updating Sheet Symbols

2001-08-23 Thread Ian Wilson
On 05:19 PM 23/08/2001 -0700, John Williams said: >Take a look at: > > http://www.aspiring-technology.com/prt_xrf.html > >John Williams > > >Brian Guralnick wrote: > > > I remember once awhile back, an automated sheet entry generator server > was once > > mentioned in this news group. Perhaps s

Re: [PEDA] Updating Sheet Symbols

2001-08-23 Thread John Williams
Take a look at: http://www.aspiring-technology.com/prt_xrf.html John Williams Brian Guralnick wrote: > I remember once awhile back, an automated sheet entry generator server was once > mentioned in this news group. Perhaps somebody remembers what it was called. > > > Brian Gura

Re: [PEDA] Updating Sheet Symbols

2001-08-23 Thread Jon Elson
Nicholas Cobb wrote: > Hi All, > I was wondering if anyone can tell me how I can update sheet symbols to > reflect changes in the names of ports of the subsheet. I know that I can > delete the sheet symbol and create a new one, but it just seems like there > should be a better way. If

Re: [PEDA] Updating Sheet Symbols

2001-08-23 Thread Brian Guralnick
el EDA Forum" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> Sent: Thursday, August 23, 2001 6:23 PM Subject: Re: [PEDA] Updating Sheet Symbols | On 04:48 PM 23/08/2001 -0500, Nicholas Cobb said: | >Hi All, | > I was wondering if anyone can tell me how I can update sheet | > symbols to | >reflect chan

Re: [PEDA] Updating Sheet Symbols

2001-08-23 Thread Ian Wilson
On 04:48 PM 23/08/2001 -0500, Nicholas Cobb said: >Hi All, > I was wondering if anyone can tell me how I can update sheet > symbols to >reflect changes in the names of ports of the subsheet. I know that I can >delete the sheet symbol and create a new one, but it just seems like there >sho