Re: [PEDA] six or eight-layer (or more?) stackups - Capacitance

2003-06-05 Thread Bagotronix Tech Support
] To: Protel EDA Forum [EMAIL PROTECTED] Sent: Tuesday, June 03, 2003 6:45 PM Subject: Re: [PEDA] six or eight-layer (or more?) stackups - Capacitance * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * To post a message: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] * * To leave this list visit: * http

Re: [PEDA] six or eight-layer (or more?) stackups - Capacitance

2003-06-04 Thread Ray Mitchell
At 03:44 PM 6/3/2003 -0400, you wrote: I thought that the following stackup was prefered because then every signal is one layer from a ground plane. 1signal 2gnd 3signal 4pwr 5pwr 6signal 7gnd 8signal But then you don't have as good decoupling

Re: [PEDA] six or eight-layer (or more?) stackups - Capacitance

2003-06-04 Thread rlamoreaux
First, my experience regarding layout is minimal at best since I seem to exhaust all the wrong ways first. I once took a class in multilayer layout and was told that the capacitance between the power/ground planes themselves was sufficient for decoupling high frequencies and that adding

Re: [PEDA] six or eight-layer (or more?) stackups - Capacitance

2003-06-04 Thread John Haddy
: Wednesday, 4 June 2003 6:25 AM To: Protel EDA Forum Subject: Re: [PEDA] six or eight-layer (or more?) stackups - Capacitance At 03:44 PM 6/3/2003 -0400, you wrote: I thought that the following stackup was prefered because then every signal is one layer from a ground plane. 1