Thanks Joel,
This is food for thought!
On Aug 10, 2010, at 2:47 AM, joel falcou wrote:
On 10/08/10 05:24, Gordon Woodhull wrote:
I wonder if Dan Marsden's Traversal library would solve this out of
the box? http://boost-spirit.com/dl_docs/traversal/html/traversal/introduction.html
Oh nice l
I'm going to write a series of posts about proto and phoenix3 for
cpp-next.com. I have a draft of the first post up. It mentions
expression templates, spirit, phoenix and proto. Please take a moment to
look it over and tell me if I've flubbed anything. All feedback welcome.
http://cpp-next.com/?p=
Reads nicely and looks fine to me.
Good job!
Regards Hartmut
---
Meet me at BoostCon
www.boostcon.com
> -Original Message-
> From: Eric Niebler [mailto:e...@boostpro.com]
> Sent: Tuesday, August 10, 2010 9:50 AM
> To: Joel de Guzman; Hartmut Kaiser; Thomas Heller; proto
> Su
That's a *great* post. There isn't much to add, the references you give are
sufficient for those who don't know about ETs.
On Tue, Aug 10, 2010 at 4:49 PM, Eric Niebler wrote:
> I'm going to write a series of posts about proto and phoenix3 for
> cpp-next.com. I have a draft of the first post up.
Well, as a complete novice to code of this sophistication I understood that
piece
perfectly, as far as it goes. Naturally, as the opening piece of a series
it raises far more questions than it answers.
It also scares me somewhat. This stuff could mark an absolute explosion
of complexity in the cod
That's great, it looks really fine! Looking forward for the next posts ;).
Good job.
___
proto mailing list
proto@lists.boost.org
http://lists.boost.org/mailman/listinfo.cgi/proto
On 8/10/2010 11:14 AM, Robert Jones wrote:
> Well, as a complete novice to code of this sophistication I
> understood that piece perfectly, as far as it goes. Naturally, as the
> opening piece of a series it raises far more questions than it
> answers.
That's great feedback, thank you.
> It also
On Tue, Aug 10, 2010 at 5:21 PM, Eric Niebler wrote:
> On 8/10/2010 11:14 AM, Robert Jones wrote:
>> Well, as a complete novice to code of this sophistication I
>> understood that piece perfectly, as far as it goes. Naturally, as the
>> opening piece of a series it raises far more questions than i
On 8/10/2010 12:03 PM, Thomas Heller wrote:
> On Tue, Aug 10, 2010 at 5:21 PM, Eric Niebler wrote:
>> On 8/10/2010 11:14 AM, Robert Jones wrote:
>>> When you get this
>>> stuff wrong, what do the error messages look like? Boost.Bind &
>>> Boost.Lambda errors are already enough to send most of us r
On Tue, Aug 10, 2010 at 7:49 AM, Eric Niebler wrote:
> I'm going to write a series of posts about proto and phoenix3 for
> cpp-next.com. I have a draft of the first post up. It mentions
> expression templates, spirit, phoenix and proto. Please take a moment to
> look it over and tell me if I've fl
On 10 August 2010 18:56, Eric Niebler wrote:
> On 8/10/2010 12:03 PM, Thomas Heller wrote:
>> And we are potentially able to reduce error message if SFINAE is
>> applied more often, with the disadvantage of losing information on
>> what failed.
>
> I disagree about SFINAE. I think it leads to horr
On 8/10/2010 4:48 AM, Gordon Woodhull wrote:
> Thanks Joel,
>
> This is food for thought!
Indeed, but I'm struggling to keep up because I don't really know what
you guys are after.
> On Aug 10, 2010, at 2:47 AM, joel falcou wrote:
>> On 10/08/10 05:24, Gordon Woodhull wrote:
>>>
>>> I wonder if
I'm on a tiny mobile, but my idéa was to have such algo as proto
transforms & grammar
> On 8/10/2010 4:48 AM, Gordon Woodhull wrote:
>> Thanks Joel,
>>
>> This is food for thought!
>
> Indeed, but I'm struggling to keep up because I don't really know what
> you guys are after.
>
>> On Aug 1
On 8/10/2010 2:52 PM, joel.fal...@lri.fr wrote:
> Eric Niebler wrote:
>> A pre-order traversal, pushing each visited node into an mpl vector? How
>> about:
> I'm on a tiny mobile, but my idéa was to have such algo as proto
> transforms & grammar
Good. Now if you are saying that Proto's existing t
> Good. Now if you are saying that Proto's existing transforms are too
> low-level and that things like pre- and post-order traversals should be
> first class Proto citizens ... no argument. Patch? :-
Yup exactly as soon as i haver a real kboard
___
pr
On Tue, Aug 10, 2010 at 6:56 PM, Eric Niebler wrote:
> On 8/10/2010 12:03 PM, Thomas Heller wrote:
>> On Tue, Aug 10, 2010 at 5:21 PM, Eric Niebler wrote:
>>> On 8/10/2010 11:14 AM, Robert Jones wrote:
When you get this
stuff wrong, what do the error messages look like? Boost.Bind &
>>>
On Tue, Aug 10, 2010 at 8:56 PM, Eric Niebler wrote:
> On 8/10/2010 2:52 PM, joel.fal...@lri.fr wrote:
>> Eric Niebler wrote:
>>> A pre-order traversal, pushing each visited node into an mpl vector? How
>>> about:
>
>> I'm on a tiny mobile, but my idéa was to have such algo as proto
>> transforms
On 8/10/2010 3:52 PM, Thomas Heller wrote:
> On Tue, Aug 10, 2010 at 8:56 PM, Eric Niebler wrote:
>> Good. Now if you are saying that Proto's existing transforms are
>> too low-level and that things like pre- and post-order traversals
>> should be first class Proto citizens ... no argument. Patch
On 8/10/2010 10:49 PM, Eric Niebler wrote:
I'm going to write a series of posts about proto and phoenix3 for
cpp-next.com. I have a draft of the first post up. It mentions
expression templates, spirit, phoenix and proto. Please take a moment to
look it over and tell me if I've flubbed anything. A
On 8/10/2010 8:31 PM, Joel de Guzman wrote:
> On 8/10/2010 10:49 PM, Eric Niebler wrote:
>> I'm going to write a series of posts about proto and phoenix3 for
>> cpp-next.com. I have a draft of the first post up. It mentions
>> expression templates, spirit, phoenix and proto. Please take a moment to
20 matches
Mail list logo
