Comment #4 on issue 148 by einavy...@gmail.com: RFE: Support Documentation
option in proto files and javadoc in generated Java files
http://code.google.com/p/protobuf/issues/detail?id=148
is there any support of .proto javadoc?
--
You received this message because you are subscribed to the
Status: New
Owner: liuj...@google.com
Labels: Type-Defect Priority-Medium
New issue 317 by einavy...@gmail.com: .proto javadoc
http://code.google.com/p/protobuf/issues/detail?id=317
hi,
I would like to generate javadoc for all auto generated .java files.
Is there any feature in .proto compiler
Thank you very much Pherl!
An another question. What about not-primitive fields, or message
fields?
when I add fields I do:
DescriptorProtos.DescriptorProto.Builder desBuilder
DescriptorProtos.FieldDescriptorProto.Builder fd1Builder =
Comment #3 on issue 295 by gglent...@gmail.com: C++ Compilation of 2.4.1
fails GLIBCXX_3.4.11 Not found
http://code.google.com/p/protobuf/issues/detail?id=295
Hello,
I have exactly the same problem, trying to build protobuf-2.4.1 on SLES11
and gcc-4.3.2.
I just add flags at configure
Good!
If I want to set a field type as Message, where I must define the
inner type?
thanks!
On Jul 26, 8:32 pm, Pherl Liu liuj...@google.com wrote:
See my response in the other thread. You can set label to the
FieldDescriptorProto.
On Tue, Jul 26, 2011 at 12:31 AM, Giancarlo Frison
Hi,
you either call setType() for primitive types or setTypeName(String)
for referenced messages.
You pass in the name of the message.
Kind regards,
Robert
On 27 Jul., 10:35, Giancarlo Frison gfri...@chelab.com wrote:
Thank you very much Pherl!
An another question. What about not-primitive
if I call setTypeName(messageName), how protobuf match the name with
related Descriptor?
How can I map messageName and the descriptor of the type?
On Jul 27, 3:56 pm, Robert robert.panzer...@googlemail.com wrote:
Hi,
you either call setType() for primitive types or setTypeName(String)
for
Comment #20 on issue 83 by jacobgla...@yahoo.com: protobuf does not compile
cleanly in 64-bit mode in Visual Studio 2008
http://code.google.com/p/protobuf/issues/detail?id=83
This is getting really annoying for me. I'm willing to start providing
patches, but I'd like to discuss before I
Updates:
Status: Duplicate
Mergedinto: 148
Comment #1 on issue 317 by liuj...@google.com: .proto javadoc
http://code.google.com/p/protobuf/issues/detail?id=317
There's a feature request about this, see
http://code.google.com/p/protobuf/issues/detail?id=148
--
You received
Comment #5 on issue 148 by liuj...@google.com: RFE: Support Documentation
option in proto files and javadoc in generated Java files
http://code.google.com/p/protobuf/issues/detail?id=148
Issue 317 has been merged into this issue.
--
You received this message because you are subscribed to
The descriptor building libraries handle cross linking. The message type
name must be defined in either the same file, or be available through one of
the file's imports.
On Wed, Jul 27, 2011 at 7:36 AM, Giancarlo Frison gfri...@chelab.comwrote:
if I call setTypeName(messageName), how protobuf
Hi,
Thanks for your hard word on the topic :)
My request is : does it exist a native module in order to include in
PHP..?
sth like .so (for Linux)
or .dll (php on Windows)
Anyway, thanks for your answers ;)
--
You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups
You have to define the name when constructing the DescriptorProto.
I have done this myself lately but unfortunately I am currently not in
the office.
But I can send you an example tomorrow of you like.
Kind regards
Robert
On 27 Jul., 16:36, Giancarlo Frison gfri...@chelab.com wrote:
if I call
Take a look at the buildFrom() method. You need to provide an array of
FileDescriptor as dependencies. If one of your message field is a complex
type, you should build that complex type first, and pass the built
FileDescriptor object to the buildFrom() in the dependencies array.
On Wed, Jul 27,
14 matches
Mail list logo
