[protobuf] Re: Building for RTEMS ARM

2015-01-22 Thread Chris Johns
Following up my own post ... On Wednesday, January 21, 2015 at 5:04:25 PM UTC+11, Chris Johns wrote: > > > The first are errors related to Atromics. We are adding -fpermissive to > make then warning. Here are a few of the many warnings we are seeing: > > from ../../protobuf.git/s

Re: [protobuf] Re: Protobuf Buffers v3.0.0-alpha-1

2015-01-22 Thread 'Feng Xiao' via Protocol Buffers
On Thu Jan 22 2015 at 4:53:53 PM wrote: > > As a new user, we still have need (C++ target) for default values, as well > as required fields (e.g., message headers for embedded target). > > 1) It appears that you are completely removing the default/required > capability from the proto3 language.

Re: [protobuf] Re: Protobuf Buffers v3.0.0-alpha-1

2015-01-22 Thread gtw . gtw4c
As a new user, we still have need (C++ target) for default values, as well as required fields (e.g., message headers for embedded target). 1) It appears that you are completely removing the default/required capability from the proto3 language. Is this correct ? 2) Will the proto2 language be

[protobuf] Re: Issue 686 in protobuf: Protoc does not provide a dependency manifest output file for build tools like make

2015-01-22 Thread protobuf
Updates: Status: WontFix Owner: xiaof...@google.com Comment #2 on issue 686 by xiaof...@google.com: Protoc does not provide a dependency manifest output file for build tools like make https://code.google.com/p/protobuf/issues/detail?id=686 Hi, could you help file this issue on

[protobuf] Re: Issue 447 in protobuf: No C++11 move constructors

2015-01-22 Thread protobuf
Comment #14 on issue 447 by mend...@gmail.com: No C++11 move constructors https://code.google.com/p/protobuf/issues/detail?id=447 So a move constructor (eventually marked as noexcept) is not a peformance gain? Right! -- You received this message because this project is configured to send all

[protobuf] Re: Issue 686 in protobuf: Protoc does not provide a dependency manifest output file for build tools like make

2015-01-22 Thread protobuf
Comment #1 on issue 686 by haberl...@gmail.com: Protoc does not provide a dependency manifest output file for build tools like make https://code.google.com/p/protobuf/issues/detail?id=686 this is what we're using - maybe can be built upon: https://github.com/machinekit/machinekit/blob/master

[protobuf] Re: Issue 531 in protobuf: Cannot build protobuf using VS2013

2015-01-22 Thread elodg
I got the same error when building for x64. The custom build command for proto files in the test projects are hard-coded to work with the default intermediate build directory in the Win32 configuration. You need to change the command property of the Custom Build Tool for all the proto files to