Re: [protobuf] Re: Has Anyone Used protobuf on ucLinux?

By the way, you may be interested in the nanopb and protobuf-c implementations, which likely have fewer dependencies. On Tue, Mar 14, 2017 at 4:50 PM, Doug Lewis wrote: > Ah I see that in the full output of the make process now. > > Yes all I really need is to get the

[protobuf] Re: Has Anyone Used protobuf on ucLinux?

Ah I see that in the full output of the make process now. Yes all I really need is to get the libraries built with the cross compiler. Thank you! Doug On Tuesday, March 14, 2017 at 2:56:04 PM UTC-5, Doug Lewis wrote: > > I've been tasked with seeing if we can use protobuf on ucLinux (micro c

Re: [protobuf] Re: Has Anyone Used protobuf on ucLinux?

So then you don't need the code that's giving you errors - it's part of protoc. It's been way too many moons since I've looked at the details for how to only build the lib and not protoc, or even if it's still possible, but you might find that that's the path of least resistance. On Tue, Mar 14,

[protobuf] Re: Has Anyone Used protobuf on ucLinux?

My host platform is an Ubuntu Linux box where the protoc compiler will run to generate the C++ code that will be cross compiled to run on the uClinux target. Doug On Tuesday, March 14, 2017 at 2:56:04 PM UTC-5, Doug Lewis wrote: > > I've been tasked with seeing if we can use protobuf on