Right - will do that, yes.
On Monday, 22 February 2016 02:46:28 UTC, ykwd.t...@gmail.com wrote:
>
> Thank you for your kind answer to my stupid question. I successfully
> compile it now.
>
> I have installed both vs2013 and vs2015. Since the 2nd line in the .sln
> file says "# Visual Studio 2013
Thank you for your kind answer to my stupid question. I successfully
compile it now.
I have installed both vs2013 and vs2015. Since the 2nd line in the .sln
file says "# Visual Studio 2013", the vs version selector automatically
start vs2013 to open this project. One can either mannually select
sorry, this post is duplicated with
this https://groups.google.com/d/topic/protobuf/qTCDyIZTqqI/discussion
Thanks for your help.
On Sunday, February 21, 2016 at 3:50:34 AM UTC+8, Josh Haberman wrote:
>
> Hi and thanks for the report. Please file bugs in GitHub issues:
> https://github.com/google
Hi and thanks for the report. Please file bugs in GitHub
issues: https://github.com/google/protobuf/issues
On Friday, February 19, 2016 at 3:57:10 PM UTC-8, ykwd.tsing...@gmail.com
wrote:
>
> Hi
>
> This is a nice project which saves me a lot of times.
>
> During my use I find a bug in some csha
In general, you'd report a bug at https://github.com/google/protobuf/issues
... but in this case there's no bug. This is perfectly valid C# 6, which is
required to build the Google.Protobuf library.
The code generated by protoc *doesn't* use C# 6, so you should be fine with
whatever you generate
