[protobuf] Help to use protobuff .net remote code
Hi, This is Chalpathi Reddy, I have a requirement to create a database file in server machine from client machine. After that I want to create tables, read, update , delete data from the server machine when sending requests from client machine. I have downloaded protobuf-remote-net-0.1.1. I am a little confusing how to use this software. Can you please explain me how to use this software sample to my requirement. Regards, Chalapathi -- You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups Protocol Buffers group. To post to this group, send email to protobuf@googlegroups.com. To unsubscribe from this group, send email to protobuf+unsubscr...@googlegroups.com. For more options, visit this group at http://groups.google.com/group/protobuf?hl=en.
[protobuf] Google ProtoBuffer: Limit size of message(bytes)
Hi, Are there any options to limit size of input output messages in protobuffer ? For example I have two messages like In and Outeach of these messages contains required byte array bytes and into this array I can write a lot of bytes, so, I want to limit size of this array for example to 1Mb How can I to do it? -- You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups Protocol Buffers group. To view this discussion on the web visit https://groups.google.com/d/msg/protobuf/-/jqQZjWR_se0J. To post to this group, send email to protobuf@googlegroups.com. To unsubscribe from this group, send email to protobuf+unsubscr...@googlegroups.com. For more options, visit this group at http://groups.google.com/group/protobuf?hl=en.
[protobuf] Undefined symbol: _ZNK6google8protobuf11MessageLite17SerializeToStringEPSs
What steps will reproduce the problem? My aim is to use Google Proto buff on VxWorks for C++. I ran below commands on cygwin in Windows7 machine. *) ./configure --target=powerpc-wrs-vxworks --enable-static=no -- disable-shared --with-protoc=protoc --enable-Multithreading *) make *) This generated 3 .a files in protobuf-2.2.0\src\.libs. They are libprotobuf.a, libprotobuf-lite.a and libprotoc.a Now I wanted to use these .a files (lib files) in my software to encode using GPB. So I copied these library files and I tried to build using scons in my package. What is the expected output? What do you see instead? I expected the scons to build smoothly. But it came with below issues and scons build failed. *) Undefined symbol: _ZNK6google8protobuf11MessageLite17SerializeToStringEPS I understand that this symbol is defined in message_lite.cpp What version of the product are you using? On what operating system? 2.2.0, installed over cygwin in Windows 7 and configured with /configure --target=powerpc-wrs-vxworks --enable-static=no -- disable-shared --with-protoc=protoc --enable-Multithreading -- You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups Protocol Buffers group. To post to this group, send email to protobuf@googlegroups.com. To unsubscribe from this group, send email to protobuf+unsubscr...@googlegroups.com. For more options, visit this group at http://groups.google.com/group/protobuf?hl=en.
[protobuf] My client language is object-c and server language is php
My client language is object-c and server language is php, object-c can parse to NSData, php can parse to String, I tried to covert NSData to NSString, but coverted NSString is not equal to php string. now, what should i do ? -- You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups Protocol Buffers group. To post to this group, send email to protobuf@googlegroups.com. To unsubscribe from this group, send email to protobuf+unsubscr...@googlegroups.com. For more options, visit this group at http://groups.google.com/group/protobuf?hl=en.
[protobuf] Re: Help to use protobuff .net remote code
If you mean protobuf-remote (which I'm not personally familiar with), that is an RPC stack. It will help you send and receive messages. Any database requirements you must handle separately. There is a manual page linked for both C# and C++ - http://code.google.com/p/protobuf-remote/ Marc On Dec 25 2011, 9:45 am, chalapathi kurakula chalapat...@gmail.com wrote: Hi, This is Chalpathi Reddy, I have a requirement to create a database file in server machine from client machine. After that I want to create tables, read, update , delete data from the server machine when sending requests from client machine. I have downloaded protobuf-remote-net-0.1.1. I am a little confusing how to use this software. Can you please explain me how to use this software sample to my requirement. Regards, Chalapathi -- You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups Protocol Buffers group. To post to this group, send email to protobuf@googlegroups.com. To unsubscribe from this group, send email to protobuf+unsubscr...@googlegroups.com. For more options, visit this group at http://groups.google.com/group/protobuf?hl=en.
[protobuf] integration with google-glog
Hi, Is it possible to configure protobuf to use google-glog (instead of the LogMessage stub)? The alternatives that I can see are to use a LogHandler to proxy logging through to glog or modify protobuf to directly use glog [1]. If these are the only options, would the protobuf project consider adding native glog support? (The patch wouldn't be very complicated -- just a few ifdef HAVE_LIB_GLOGs). Thanks, -Andy [1] http://cxwangyi.wordpress.com/2010/11/21/make-google-protobuf-use-google-glog/ -- You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups Protocol Buffers group. To post to this group, send email to protobuf@googlegroups.com. To unsubscribe from this group, send email to protobuf+unsubscr...@googlegroups.com. For more options, visit this group at http://groups.google.com/group/protobuf?hl=en.
[protobuf] Re: Issue 120 in protobuf: Request to allow extending CodedInputStream and CodeOutputStream
Comment #8 on issue 120 by ken...@google.com: Request to allow extending CodedInputStream and CodeOutputStream http://code.google.com/p/protobuf/issues/detail?id=120 It's true that because Coded*Stream are public, we cannot contract these interfaces. However, we *do* currently have the ability to *expand* these interfaces without breaking anyone, whereas with your proposed change this would be considerably more difficult. Moreover, it is much easier for us to change the pattern of calls made by the protobuf implementation *to* these interfaces when there is only one implementation. If there are multiple implementations, we don't know the affect our changes might have. For an extreme example, imagine if in the future we discover that we can make encoding much faster by generating code which writes directly to CodedOutputStream's underlying byte array rather than calling its various methods. So we add a new method like byte[] getBuffer(), and the encoder now calls only that. Your custom implementation of CodedOutputStream would be thoroughly broken by this, probably requiring a complete re-design and rewrite of your entire project. Since it's hard to tell how many people would be broken by such a change, we'd probably avoid making it in the first place, meaning everyone remains stuck with an inferior implementation. So, you see, this kind of decision is not as clear-cut as it at first seems. Adding any sort of abstraction to the library requires careful thought and design. If you want to pursue this, you'll probably need to start a discussion thread on the mailing list where you and the protobuf maintainers (which no longer include me) can discuss the pros and cons in more detail. Regarding benchmarks, I think there are some Java benchmarks in the SVN repo that you can run fairly easily. -- You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups Protocol Buffers group. To post to this group, send email to protobuf@googlegroups.com. To unsubscribe from this group, send email to protobuf+unsubscr...@googlegroups.com. For more options, visit this group at http://groups.google.com/group/protobuf?hl=en.
[protobuf] tcp get packet
client send a proto packet to server by tcp, and how do the server certain the packet size? make a packet head? -- You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups Protocol Buffers group. To post to this group, send email to protobuf@googlegroups.com. To unsubscribe from this group, send email to protobuf+unsubscr...@googlegroups.com. For more options, visit this group at http://groups.google.com/group/protobuf?hl=en.
Re: [protobuf] tcp get packet
On Tue, Jan 3, 2012 at 18:37, calvin zhu calvinmy0...@gmail.com wrote: client send a proto packet to server by tcp, and how do the server certain the packet size? make a packet head? If you want to make sure that you got the whole packet, you need to add a header with the size, yes. A simple way is to serialize the content to a string first, determine the size and send that size at the very beginning. This has as well the advantage, that you can send multiple messages, each separated with a size-header on the same tcp connection. This is essentially described in http://code.google.com/apis/protocolbuffers/docs/techniques.html#streaming Easiest is to just send a fixed 32 bit value. A bit more fancy would be to use a varint ( http://code.google.com/apis/protocolbuffers/docs/encoding.html#varints ). -h -- You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups Protocol Buffers group. To post to this group, send email to protobuf@googlegroups.com. To unsubscribe from this group, send email to protobuf+unsubscr...@googlegroups.com. For more options, visit this group at http://groups.google.com/group/protobuf?hl=en.
