Comment #5 on issue 344 by elivei...@gmail.com: Compile Error in Visual
Studio 2010 and 2011 (developer preview)
http://code.google.com/p/protobuf/issues/detail?id=344
Thanks. I worked around this by disabling the tests.
--
You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google
Comment #17 on issue 298 by cjdo...@gmail.com: protobuf jar's manifest
should include OSGi metadata
http://code.google.com/p/protobuf/issues/detail?id=298
Re: it doesn't seem right to me that we should change protobuf to make it
conform to the specification of a certain container. All
Comment #18 on issue 298 by rocketra...@gmail.com: protobuf jar's manifest
should include OSGi metadata
http://code.google.com/p/protobuf/issues/detail?id=298
it doesn't seem right to me that we should change protobuf to make it
conform to the specification of a certain container. -- In
Comment #19 on issue 298 by cvgav...@gmail.com: protobuf jar's manifest
should include OSGi metadata
http://code.google.com/p/protobuf/issues/detail?id=298
I would like to use protobuf (in its latest version) in my equinox project
too... Today I had to use a old version that was wrapped by
Comment #20 on issue 298 by m...@thebishops.org: protobuf jar's manifest
should include OSGi metadata
http://code.google.com/p/protobuf/issues/detail?id=298
Protobuf is about enabling optimal data transfer between devices and
servers. OSGi is about java software on mobile devices as well
Comment #21 on issue 298 by xiaof...@google.com: protobuf jar's manifest
should include OSGi metadata
http://code.google.com/p/protobuf/issues/detail?id=298
I have no idea of how widely OSGi is used in the open source community. Is
it the suggested way to add OSGi meta data to every Java
Comment #22 on issue 298 by matteo.c...@gmail.com: protobuf jar's manifest
should include OSGi metadata
http://code.google.com/p/protobuf/issues/detail?id=298
This is the best way to add suport in my opinion since the manifest file
gets generated and there's no room for mistakes there -
Comment #23 on issue 298 by cjdo...@gmail.com: protobuf jar's manifest
should include OSGi metadata
http://code.google.com/p/protobuf/issues/detail?id=298
Re: Is it the suggested way to add OSGi meta data to every Java jar? Yes.
Increased modularity is Java's future, and OSGi is the
Comment #24 on issue 298 by xiaof...@google.com: protobuf jar's manifest
should include OSGi metadata
http://code.google.com/p/protobuf/issues/detail?id=298
OK, I'll patch the change suggested in comment #7 to the trunk soon. Thanks
for your info.
--
You received this message because you
Comment #25 on issue 298 by debroux@gmail.com: protobuf jar's manifest
should include OSGi metadata
http://code.google.com/p/protobuf/issues/detail?id=298
It could be good to have two different artifacts for the full-blown version
and the significantly smaller and leaner lite
Comment #26 on issue 298 by rocketra...@gmail.com: protobuf jar's manifest
should include OSGi metadata
http://code.google.com/p/protobuf/issues/detail?id=298
If you have a lite and full jar, from an OSGi perspective, it is better
*not* to distinguish the package exports i.e. for the
11 matches
Mail list logo
