[protobuf] 2.6.0rc1 fails to build on mac 10.9

2014-08-21 Thread Simon Newton
$ g++ --version Configured with: --prefix=/Applications/Xcode.app/Contents/Developer/usr --with-gxx-include-dir=/usr/include/c++/4.2.1 Apple LLVM version 5.1 (clang-503.0.40) (based on LLVM 3.4svn) Target: x86_64-apple-darwin13.3.0 Thread model: posix I get the same errors when I use clang++

[protobuf] Re: 2.6.0 release candidate

2014-08-21 Thread Simon Newton
On Tuesday, August 19, 2014 1:39:28 PM UTC-7, Jie Luo wrote: Hi all, I have uploaded the release candidate of protobuf-2.6.0 (protobuf-2.6.0rc1) here: https://protobuf.googlecode.com/svn/rc/ The RC1 has been tested on Linux, Mac, Cygwin, MinGW and MSVC (2010, 2013). Feel free

Re: [protobuf] 2.6.0 release candidate

2014-08-21 Thread Simon Newton
On Thu, Aug 21, 2014 at 8:49 AM, Simon Newton si...@nomis52.net wrote: I get a build failures on Mac OS X 10.9: Sorry please ignore that, I was building the wrong RC. Simon $ g++ --version Configured with: --prefix=/Applications/Xcode.app/Contents/Developer/usr

Re: [protobuf] 2.6.0 release candidate

2014-08-21 Thread Simon Newton
I get a build failures on Mac OS X 10.9: $ g++ --version Configured with: --prefix=/Applications/Xcode.app/Contents/Developer/usr --with-gxx-include-dir=/usr/include/c++/4.2.1 Apple LLVM version 5.1 (clang-503.0.40) (based on LLVM 3.4svn) Target: x86_64-apple-darwin13.3.0 Thread model: posix I

[protobuf] Re: Issue 308 in protobuf: unresolved external symbol kEmptyString when linking protobuf as a dll.

2014-08-21 Thread protobuf
Comment #13 on issue 308 by jarek2ch...@gmail.com: unresolved external symbol kEmptyString when linking protobuf as a dll. http://code.google.com/p/protobuf/issues/detail?id=308 hi, i've sloved this issue by modyfing files enerated_message_util.h/cc adding decoration LIBPROTOBUF_EXPORT:

[protobuf] Issue 663 in protobuf: Undefined behavior while running unit tests

2014-08-21 Thread protobuf
Status: New Owner: Labels: Type-Defect Priority-Medium New issue 663 by robert.e...@gmail.com: Undefined behavior while running unit tests http://code.google.com/p/protobuf/issues/detail?id=663 Hello, When compiling protobuf 2.6.0-rc1 with gcc 4.9's undefined behavior detector, I get

Re: [protobuf] Re: 2.6.0 release candidate

2014-08-21 Thread 'Jie Luo' via Protocol Buffers
Thank you Simon. I've add stl_util.h to nobase_include_HEADERS by https://code.google.com/p/protobuf/source/detail?r=574 Thanks, Jie 2014-08-21 9:54 GMT-07:00 Simon Newton si...@nomis52.net: On Tuesday, August 19, 2014 1:39:28 PM UTC-7, Jie Luo wrote: Hi all, I have uploaded the release

Re: [protobuf] 2.6.0 release candidate

2014-08-21 Thread Robert Edmonds
'Feng Xiao' via Protocol Buffers wrote: Can you help to do this? We'll probably need some changes to the patch but as we can't test it in the relevant platforms the code review is better to be initiated by someone who can make the change and test the change. It's very simple to create such a

[protobuf] Re: Issue 488 in protobuf: powerpc-linux cross compilation not compiling anymore

2014-08-21 Thread protobuf
Comment #9 on issue 488 by robert.e...@gmail.com: powerpc-linux cross compilation not compiling anymore https://code.google.com/p/protobuf/issues/detail?id=488 https://codereview.appspot.com/129490043/ is based on Stanislav's patch, and is based on the patch we used in the Debian package

[protobuf] Re: Issue 663 in protobuf: Undefined behavior while running unit tests

2014-08-21 Thread protobuf
Updates: Owner: jie...@google.com Comment #1 on issue 663 by jie...@google.com: Undefined behavior while running unit tests https://code.google.com/p/protobuf/issues/detail?id=663 Yes our implementation used this undefined behavior. Line 1103 -static_castint64(value); tries to cast

[protobuf] Re: Issue 637 in protobuf: Patch for /trunk/src/google/protobuf/stubs/once.cc

2014-08-21 Thread protobuf
Updates: Status: Fixed Owner: jie...@google.com Labels: FixedIn-2.6.0 Comment #3 on issue 637 by jie...@google.com: Patch for /trunk/src/google/protobuf/stubs/once.cc https://code.google.com/p/protobuf/issues/detail?id=637 fixed by