+liujisi, who should have a better idea of why default value is dropped
from proto3 and what alternatives users can rely on.
Internally the design of proto3 has been discussed among a group of people
for quite a long time, but most of them haven't subscribed this forum
though...
On Wed, Jan 7, 201
Did anyone get a chance to look at this request?
On Wednesday, December 17, 2014 3:54:12 PM UTC-8, Arjun Satish wrote:
>
> Hey guys,
>
> Thanks for all the hard work!
>
> I have a question regarding the decision to drop support for default
> values. Fields which are set to their default values
Status: New
Owner: liuj...@google.com
Labels: Type-Defect Priority-Medium
New issue 684 by edgar@gmail.com: integer overflow
https://code.google.com/p/protobuf/issues/detail?id=684
What steps will reproduce the problem?
svn diff stringprintf_unittest.cc
Index: stringprintf_unittest.cc
==
Comment #11 on issue 270 by osu...@gmail.com: Precompiled protoc binary for
OS X
https://code.google.com/p/protobuf/issues/detail?id=270
You could also try this:
https://github.com/os72/protoc-jar
https://github.com/os72/protoc-jar-maven-plugin
Either directly via "java -jar ...", or extract
