[protobuf] protobuf rpc how to let the c++ client and python server can work with protobuf rpc?

2015-01-13 Thread zzhcn521
protobuf rpc how to let the c++ client and python server can work with protobuf rpc? -- You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups "Protocol Buffers" group. To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it, send an email to protobuf+unsubscr...

Re: [protobuf] Re: Protobuf Buffers v3.0.0-alpha-1

2015-01-13 Thread Arjun Satish
Since this feature is never going to be exposed, what advice do you have for people who are using this feature and want to migrate to v3? Also, what can we do as users to skip encoding certain fields with the new library? Thanks, On Tue, Jan 13, 2015 at 3:10 PM, Feng Xiao wrote: > > > On Tue, J

Re: [protobuf] Re: Protobuf Buffers v3.0.0-alpha-1

2015-01-13 Thread 'Feng Xiao' via Protocol Buffers
On Tue, Jan 13, 2015 at 3:05 PM, Arjun Satish wrote: > Feng, > > What do you mean when you say "In C++/Java/Python where we support both > proto2 and proto3, default values will continue to exist"? > What I meant is that you can still find its traces in the implementation but the feature itself i

Re: [protobuf] Re: Protobuf Buffers v3.0.0-alpha-1

2015-01-13 Thread Arjun Satish
Feng, What do you mean when you say "In C++/Java/Python where we support both proto2 and proto3, default values will continue to exist"? When I run protoc (v3) with the syntax="proto3" tag, it shows an error "Explicit default values are not allowed in proto3." and exits (no code is generated). Thi

Re: [protobuf] Re: Protobuf Buffers v3.0.0-alpha-1

2015-01-13 Thread 'Feng Xiao' via Protocol Buffers
On Mon, Jan 12, 2015 at 10:40 PM, Arjun Satish wrote: > Would it be possible to re-introduce this feature in a subsequent release? > It seems like you are still using it under-the-hood. > In C++/Java/Python where we support both proto2 and proto3, default values will continue to exist. In new lan