Hi all, I got a wild idea... The well know types is used a lot but they are
cumbersome to write.As a contract first DSL this is not really readable.
What if we could get rid of the complete package. It could be as simple as
replacing the package of WKT by !
Example for wrappers:
message
be decoupled from the
versioning of your microservice. I hope this helps.
_/
_/ Alex Van Boxel
On Fri, Jun 28, 2019 at 12:03 PM 'anand' via Protocol Buffers <
protobuf@googlegroups.com> wrote:
> Team,
>
> How can i achieve the versioning in protocol buffer , I have one use cases
> wh
as a source for your code (be it go
or something else) is that you change your thinking pattern. It makes you
think about your contract, it's easy to keep compatible because you know
and see what you are doing with your messages.
_/
_/ Alex Van Boxel
On Thu, Aug 22, 2019 at 12:38 AM Srinivasa Rao
That why you have the Well Known Wrapper Types. They are included in the
proto repo and live right next to the Timestamp and Duration:
https://github.com/protocolbuffers/protobuf/blob/master/src/google/protobuf/wrappers.proto
On Thu, Aug 22, 2019, 10:43 Denis Feklushkin
wrote:
>
>
> пн, 12
/ProtoLanguageFileWriter.java
It currently only support proto3.
_/
_/ Alex Van Boxel
On Fri, Feb 21, 2020 at 11:02 AM Nadav Samet wrote:
> Hi Ittai,
>
> It sounds like you are expecting your plugin to emit proto files in text
> format. Your code is assigning binary data into the file's content
Hi all,
I have 2 utility classes for the Java implementation I like to donate to
the java implementation:
https://github.com/anemos-io/metastore/tree/master/putils
I've been using it into our protobuf schema registry but they stand on it's
own:
ProtoDomain:
- wrapper around
Actually your question triggered something I wanted todo for a long time.
You could join the discussion on this thread:
https://groups.google.com/forum/#!topic/protobuf/NrhCXiXIfxk
_/
_/ Alex Van Boxel
On Fri, Feb 21, 2020 at 1:23 PM ittai zeidman wrote:
> Nice! Thanks :)
> I’ll try
Congratulations, cool to see other people using it ;-)
Indeed, I rather have it part protobuf-java before haven maven-artifact.
You can fill issues on the metastore repo, it's not abandoned. It's
activity developed (I'll copy issues over when a move is ever node.
_/
_/ Alex Van Boxel
On Fri
se options for this, but we use it a-lot in our Big Data
pipelines.
_/
_/ Alex Van Boxel
On Thu, Apr 9, 2020 at 12:48 PM Alex Barlow wrote:
> Hi all,
>
> I'm a big user of protobuf in several roles now and a common theme is
> recreating the publish and subscribe pattern as well as
I'm getting tired of the spam in this group. Where are the owners of this
group. They should kick out abusive Interview poster out of this group.
I'm marking his posts as abusive, but that doesn't seem to help. I'm
thinking about leaving this group as the spam is too much.
Thanks.
--
You
10 matches
Mail list logo
