Hi,
In the documentation here:
http://code.google.com/apis/protocolbuffers/docs/techniques.html#large-data
it specifies that if you are dealing in messages larger than a
megabyte each, it may be time to consider an alternate strategy.
My question is: does this apply to messages which are
The value returned by Message::ByteSize() does not match the actually
number of bytes that are consumed after writing a message to a
stream. Example:
some_message m;
/* ... populate m ... */
size_t len = m.ByteSize();
int pos =
be broken. Can you provide a complete example program that
demonstrates your problem?
On Wed, Oct 7, 2009 at 4:01 PM, Brenden Matthews bren...@diddyinc.comwrote:
The value returned by Message::ByteSize() does not match the actually
number of bytes that are consumed after writing a message
On Wed, Oct 7, 2009 at 6:48 PM, Henner Zeller h.zel...@acm.org wrote:
Still haven't run it (I only seem to have a too old cmake; a simple
Makefile with a .proto and .cc file showing the problem would be
better. Please strip down the example if someone should help debugging
it ;) )
Anyway,
edf13be13766caa1a496c9feeced8d9d24de0c10 Mon Sep 17 00:00:00 2001
From: Brenden Matthews bren...@diddyinc.com
Date: Tue, 23 Nov 2010 17:01:01 -0800
Subject: [PATCH] Display non-present fields with TextFormat.
This allows for the non-presence of optional fields to be represented in
string output
On Tue, Nov 23, 2010 at 5:04 PM, Brenden Matthews bren...@diddyinc.comwrote:
Greetings,
One of the best features of protocol buffers is the notion of presence.
Another great feature is the ability to do 'message.PrintDebugString()'.
One problem, however, is that fields which
