On Tue, Mar 10, 2015 at 5:09 PM, Patrick Linehan pline...@gmail.com wrote:
A simple workaround is to modify the compiler output to make both
memoizedIsInitialized and isInitalized into ints. This avoids any need for
casting or sign extension.
Wait what? If this is really the problem, why not
This is not really a protobuf question, moreso a C++ question. But anyways,
the typical way to do this is:
template typename T struct MatrixTraits { };
template struct MatrixTraitsdouble { typedef DoubleMatrix type; };
template struct MatrixTraitsfloat{ typedef FloatMatrix type; };
I think you might actually want two memory barriers, something like
MemoryBarrier();
*ptr = value;
MemoryBarrier();
your current solution prevents compiler reordering the store with
statements after, but what about statements before?
On Thu, Jan 23, 2014 at 11:20 AM, proto...@googlecode.com
Yes my bad, it is not called SequentiallyConsistentStore but AcquireStore :)
On Thu, Jan 23, 2014 at 11:57 AM, Peter Burka pe...@quux.net wrote:
Hi Stephen,
Honestly I didn't think about it too deeply. I simply copied the same
pattern that the x86-64 SSE2 code is using. If a second barrier
MemoryBarrier() should probably have a compiler fence in it. For gcc, this
looks like:
asm volatile( ::: memory)
not sure about other compilers.
On Tue, Jan 21, 2014 at 2:57 PM, Peter Burka pe...@quux.net wrote:
If accepted, please attribute the patch to my work address: peter dot
burka at
If you link in tcmalloc to your app, it should just work w/o having to
change any code. See http://goog-perftools.sourceforge.net/doc/tcmalloc.html
On Thu, Aug 8, 2013 at 7:12 AM, proto...@googlecode.com wrote:
Status: New
Owner: liuj...@google.com
Labels: Type-Defect Priority-Medium
New
Yes, observe:
$ cat t.cc
#include iostream
using namespace std;
struct foo { char b[4096]; };
int
main(void)
{
foo *f = new foo;
return 0;
}
$ g++ -o t t.cc -ltcmalloc
$ gdb --args ./t
GNU gdb (GDB) 7.6
Copyright (C) 2013 Free Software Foundation, Inc.
License GPLv3+: GNU GPL version 3 or
You should just be able to use the Java bindings.
On Tue, Jan 15, 2013 at 8:07 AM, Florian Johannßen
fjohanns...@googlemail.com wrote:
Hi everybody,
is it possible to use ProtoBuff in Scala-projects?
Do you have made any experience with it?
Kind regards
Florian
--
You received this
