, Zachary Turner
divisorthe...@gmail.comwrote:
Reading through old threads, I found one that said that the next
release would probably include Petar's python wrapper for native C++
protobufs, greatly increasing speed of protubufs when calling from
Python.
Another post mentioned
Reading through old threads, I found one that said that the next
release would probably include Petar's python wrapper for native C++
protobufs, greatly increasing speed of protubufs when calling from
Python.
Another post mentioned that this was expected to be done sometime this
summer.
Now that
, and it should at least
include a beta of this work.
On Tue, Sep 14, 2010 at 10:36 AM, Zachary Turner
divisorthe...@gmail.comwrote:
Reading through old threads, I found one that said that the next
release would probably include Petar's python wrapper for native C++
protobufs, greatly
Just tried it in 2005 with the following code:
#include iostream
#include string
namespace test
{
using std::vector;
using std::string;
using std::cout;
templatetypename T struct X
{
void f()
{
vectorstring v;
v.push_back(string(hi));
cout
I managed to get it down to a minimal sample that reproduces the
problem in VS2005. It doesn't even need a separate header. The
following complete program exhibits the problem independent of whether
or not precompiled headers are being used:
#include iostream
#include string
namespace test
{
How hard would it be to modify the code generator so that whenever there was
a field of type bytes, a method was generated called
assign_allocated(const char*, int nSize), that instead of creating an
std::string(), would just store the raw pointer as well as the size, and not
take ownership of the
I have a fairly old version of the protobuf library, so if this has
been changed let me know, but I have a situation where Message::Clear
() is causing my cpu to go to like 70% for an extended period of time.
It's also possible this is user error, so please correct me if that's
the case.
into your profiles and see what part of Clear() is taking so long?
For example, is it spending the time clearing STL strings?
On Thu, Mar 5, 2009 at 3:11 PM, Zachary Turner divisorthe...@gmail.comwrote:
I have a fairly old version of the protobuf library, so if this has
been changed let me
into the cleared list?
On Thu, Mar 5, 2009 at 5:25 PM, Kenton Varda ken...@google.com wrote:
Add this to your .proto file:
option optimize_for = SPEED;
Does it help?
On Thu, Mar 5, 2009 at 3:23 PM, Zachary Turner divisorthe...@gmail.comwrote:
I'll give it a try. I haven't built the protobuf
