[protobuf] Re: strange behavior for a bool attribute with default value

2010-06-16 Thread mo
1. I run it under valgrind. It shows unconditional jump on the line that is calling has_is_valid(), and if I remove that if() block, there is no memcheck or leakcheck problems at all. I have to mention that: a) the messages that I am trying to parse are generated by apps that are using an older

[protobuf] Re: strange behavior for a bool attribute with default value

2010-06-16 Thread mo
what I meant about unconditional jump was in fact Conditional jump or move depends on uninitialised value(s) message. -- You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups Protocol Buffers group. To post to this group, send email to proto...@googlegroups.com. To

Re: warnings compiling generated code on Snow Leopard

2009-09-25 Thread mo
So is there a decision for this issue? Will it be a flag for protoc or a patch (I think I saw somewhere a post mentioning that the patch was not going to be used because of other issues)? And any possible ETA for the solution? On Aug 31, 5:33 pm, Kenton Varda ken...@google.com wrote: I'm OK