RE: [protobuf] [Dependencies] Never had so much difficulties to integrate a library (protobuf) in my life (C++ / Qt / Windows)

2015-10-19 Thread sumit kumar
Java guy trying C++, right ? Its not protobuf's fault, its your lack of C++ knowledge. You just need to set these 3 things in your project:Include path of the protobuf include folder (this folder contains the google directory)The protobuf lib pathThe libprobuf as lib dependency on your project

Re: [protobuf] Re: Protobuf Buffers v3.0.0-alpha-1

2015-01-21 Thread Sumit Kumar
. Likewise market order with no price set is valid and with any other price set is invalid (including the 0 value). And there are many other cases, but anyway if the decision is made then not much value discussing it. Regards, Sumit Kumar On 17 Jan 2015, at 10:52 am, V.B. vidalborro...@gmail.com wrote

RE: [protobuf] Re: Plans to support C#?

2014-12-19 Thread sumit kumar
Another +1 for oneof C# support Date: Wed, 17 Dec 2014 13:32:43 -0800 From: ejb...@gmail.com To: protobuf@googlegroups.com Subject: [protobuf] Re: Plans to support C#? +1 for oneof. -- You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups Protocol Buffers group. To

Re: [protobuf] string-valued enum needed when implementing OpenRTB2.1 proto file

2014-04-02 Thread Sumit Kumar
You could define an enum value option such as string_name and use that in your proto definition, and then write a simple plugin to generate what you need. Regards, Sumit Kumar On 31 Mar, 2014, at 12:15 am, Oliver Jowett oliver.jow...@gmail.com wrote: If the protobuf mapping is a new mapping

Re: [protobuf] Re: Issue 269 in protobuf: Would like to have byte or int8 type for the message definition

2013-03-14 Thread Sumit Kumar
No you cant, on C++ bytes translates to string, wont allow for null. Regards, Sumit Kumar On 14 Mar, 2013, at 2:39 AM, Feng Xiao xiaof...@google.com wrote: You can just use bytes field. On Wed, Mar 13, 2013 at 5:38 AM, Giri Guntipalli giri.guntipa...@gmail.com wrote: we need similar

Re: [protobuf] Re: Issue 329 in protobuf: Add support for [deprecated = true] on all types of definitions

2013-03-14 Thread Sumit Kumar
Can we insert compiler warning for C++ builds as well in cases where deprecated field is used ? Regards, Sumit Kumar On 14 Mar, 2013, at 2:36 AM, proto...@googlecode.com wrote: Comment #3 on issue 329 by sergei.s...@gmail.com: Add support for [deprecated = true] on all types

Re: [protobuf] Re: Issue 269 in protobuf: Would like to have byte or int8 type for the message definition

2013-03-14 Thread Sumit Kumar
fixed8String instead. Accessors can be added via simple plugin that uses protoc insert point. Regards, Sumit Kumar On 13 Mar, 2013, at 8:38 PM, Giri Guntipalli giri.guntipa...@gmail.com wrote: we need similar thing to hold binary data in proto message, where i can not use string because binary