Re: [protobuf] Custom options namespace

2011-09-21 Thread Pherl Liu
The document generally said you can use the same extension number for different level of options, but the qualified extension name needs to be unique. e.g. a single extension name cannot extend more than one type. That said, you probably have to use different option name for the purpose. Note,

[protobuf] Custom options namespace

2011-09-16 Thread Thiago Cangussu
Hi, I am trying to create an option (documentation) that appears at different levels (message-level, field-level, etc), but I got an error saying that the name was already defined in the package. The documentation states that: Also, note that each option type (file-level, message-level,