Re: [protobuf] Re: Options

2010-03-15 Thread Kenton Varda
The problem I keep running into here is that anything one proposes leaves more to be desired. If I can munge options, shouldn't I also be able to munge types? What if I want to take a message type, remove some fields that I don't care about (so that I can drop some dependencies), change a

[protobuf] Re: Options

2010-03-09 Thread Dave Bailey
I think it would be really helpful to be able to override anything in FileOptions from the command line, at least. I'm not sure if anyone would really want to override options at other levels (Message/Field/ Enum/Service/Method)... but maybe something like: # apply a file-level option to