[protobuf] Re: strange behavior for a bool attribute with default value

2010-06-16 Thread mo
1. I run it under valgrind. It shows unconditional jump on the line
that is calling has_is_valid(), and if I remove that if() block,
there is no memcheck or leakcheck problems at all.
I have to mention that: a) the messages that I am trying to parse are
generated by apps that are using an older version of the proto file,
which does not have the optional bool  is_valid = 7 [default = true];
 in it, but I suppose it shouldn't matter because there is a default
value there, and b) other attributes in the message are parsed
perfectly fine.

2. I'll see if I could generate the problem with a smaller proto and
code and if so, will post it here.

-- 
You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups 
Protocol Buffers group.
To post to this group, send email to proto...@googlegroups.com.
To unsubscribe from this group, send email to 
protobuf+unsubscr...@googlegroups.com.
For more options, visit this group at 
http://groups.google.com/group/protobuf?hl=en.



[protobuf] Re: strange behavior for a bool attribute with default value

2010-06-16 Thread mo

what I meant about unconditional jump was in fact Conditional jump
or move depends on uninitialised value(s) message.

-- 
You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups 
Protocol Buffers group.
To post to this group, send email to proto...@googlegroups.com.
To unsubscribe from this group, send email to 
protobuf+unsubscr...@googlegroups.com.
For more options, visit this group at 
http://groups.google.com/group/protobuf?hl=en.