Sure. This week is going to be full of maven stuff for me anyway.
I'll add it to the list.
On Fri, Oct 16, 2009 at 4:49 PM, Kenton Varda ken...@google.com wrote:
Greg, I know you're pretty busy, but maybe you could assign this to someone
to finish up?
On Fri, Oct 16, 2009 at 9:03 AM, maxaf
The plugin is perfectly usable. I stumbled upon it today during my
quest to integrate protobuf with a Maven project. Here's what
transpired:
http://stackoverflow.com/questions/1578456
Forget about the damn unit tests. Just get the plugin out into the
wild and end the suspense. It's good to go
Greg, I know you're pretty busy, but maybe you could assign this to someone
to finish up?
On Fri, Oct 16, 2009 at 9:03 AM, maxaf m...@bumnetworks.com wrote:
The plugin is perfectly usable. I stumbled upon it today during my
quest to integrate protobuf with a Maven project. Here's what
On Sat, Oct 17, 2009 at 12:03 AM, maxaf m...@bumnetworks.com wrote:
The plugin is perfectly usable. I stumbled upon it today during my
quest to integrate protobuf with a Maven project. Here's what
transpired:
http://stackoverflow.com/questions/1578456
Hmm, so it still requires that you
This has come up before. There are several reasons why a Java port of
protoc probably won't fly:- The C/C++ open source community will not accept
Java in their build process.
- Java is not available to all platforms that currently support protocol
buffers.
- Maintaining two complete
hi,
someone checked in a maven plugin earlier this year. are there any
plans to make this available through a Maven repository?
(in the process of adopting Maven, so not entirely sure how I can
contribute at the moment)
-Bjørn
--~--~-~--~~~---~--~~
You
