On Tue, Jul 20, 2010 at 1:21 PM, Mark ftd...@yahoo.com wrote:
Hi,
Using the latest release of PB, I am able to generate the FileDescriptorSet
using protoc. my intent is to be able to parse incoming messages using the
DynamicMessage class. my understanding is that from the FileDescriptorSet,
Comment #7 on issue 187 by ken...@google.com: Command-line argument to
override the optimize_for option
http://code.google.com/p/protobuf/issues/detail?id=187
If you just want to append a string to the file, you can easily do that
like:
cp foo.proto foo2.proto
echo 'option
Updates:
Owner: gk5885
Comment #1 on issue 203 by ken...@google.com: mvn install ordering
dependency
http://code.google.com/p/protobuf/issues/detail?id=203
To clarify, the problem occurs only when the lite version is built *after*
the full version without cleaning in between.
Comment #8 on issue 187 by dima: Command-line argument to override
the optimize_for option
http://code.google.com/p/protobuf/issues/detail?id=187
Now suppose foo.proto is imported by a few other .proto files... You'll
have to modify each one of them, too.
Every other compiler - gcc,
Updates:
Owner: pesho.petrov
Comment #1 on issue 206 by ken...@google.com: Python: possible to set
invalid enum value
http://code.google.com/p/protobuf/issues/detail?id=206
Petar, I believe you were already planning to address this? Or did we
decide that this change would break
Comment #9 on issue 187 by ken...@google.com: Command-line argument to
override the optimize_for option
http://code.google.com/p/protobuf/issues/detail?id=187
I agree that protoc should provide something. I was merely pointing out
that eshober's suggestion can trivially be implemented
IMO you should just include a tag field which contains some unique
identifier, as described in the docs you cite.
The reflection interface, if you want to use it, is documented here:
http://code.google.com/apis/protocolbuffers/docs/reference/cpp/google.protobuf.message.html#Reflection
On Fri,
On Thu, Jul 15, 2010 at 2:22 AM, Jamie McCrindle
jamiemccrin...@gmail.comwrote:
Hi all,
I've built a lightweight PB RPC implementation over HTTP which I'd
like to pad out with some more functionality but I have a few design
questions that I was hoping some of you folk in the group may be
If you are writing a library, and the client of your library knows the exact
type desired, then they should pass to you the class's default instance (C++
and Java; in Python they might as well pass the class itself). In C++ this
is MyType::default_instance(), in Java MyType.getDefaultInstance().
Comment #19 on issue 81 by ken...@google.com: Maven Protoc Plugin Code
Review
http://code.google.com/p/protobuf/issues/detail?id=81
Hi all,
It seems clear that Greg doesn't have time to maintain this, and I can't
maintain it either as I know nothing about Maven. Would someone like to
Comment #10 on issue 187 by esho...@fusionio.com: Command-line argument to
override the optimize_for option
http://code.google.com/p/protobuf/issues/detail?id=187
Admittedly, my suggestion above does not handle imports and that makes it
mostly unusable whether done in or outside of protoc.
Hi all,
I am having trouble compiling this .pbj file:
message JSFieldValue
{
optional string s_value = 1;
optional int32 i_value = 2;
optional JSMessage o_value = 3;
}
message JSField
{
required string name = 1;
optional JSFieldValue value = 2;
optional string prototype
What's pbj? Looks like a third-party protobuf implementation? If so you
might want to contact the authors directly; I'm not sure if they read this
list.
On Tue, Jul 20, 2010 at 7:14 PM, bhupc chandra.bhup...@gmail.com wrote:
Hi all,
I am having trouble compiling this .pbj file:
message
13 matches
Mail list logo
