Comment #4 on issue 286 by briss...@gmail.com: Inconsistency with repeated
fields using C++ protobufs
http://code.google.com/p/protobuf/issues/detail?id=286
Same for me, this bug is causing a lot of problems for us. Any fix ?
Regards,
Julien
--
You received this message because this project
Comment #5 on issue 286 by xiaof...@google.com: Inconsistency with repeated
fields using C++ protobufs
http://code.google.com/p/protobuf/issues/detail?id=286
Internally we have replaced the python c++ implementation with a new one
and the refcounting problem has been addressed in the new de
Hi,
PHP Protobuf is another Protocol Buffers PHP implementation. It is written
as extension in C providing high performance. The project is on Github here:
https://github.com/allegro/php-protobuf/
Could you add it to the Third Party Add-Ons wiki page?
I suppose it would go under the "PHP" prog
I'm receiving a serialized message over middleware (qpid), and I want to be
able to instantiate a Message object in my base class which does not know
the actual message type. I have a feeling this isn't actually possible, and
I can easily workaround this by just passing the serialized message to
On Wed, May 22, 2013 at 12:12 AM, Hubert Jagodziński <
hubert.jagodzin...@gmail.com> wrote:
> Hi,
>
> PHP Protobuf is another Protocol Buffers PHP implementation. It is written
> as extension in C providing high performance. The project is on Github here:
>
> https://github.com/allegro/php-protobu
Is it expected that the type of the message is available at
compile/run-time, or are you trying to load it dynamically? If
dynamically, you'd have to pass the descriptor as part of the message,
which is a little annoying (since it's not just the message, but also
any messages that that message refe
Thank you for your response Ilia.
I was beginning to realize that I would have to provide some additional
information for it to work beyond just the serialized data. I hadn't,
however, thought of embedding it using the AMQP message options to make it
work. Not sure why it didn't occur to me, b
Comment #6 on issue 286 by briss...@gmail.com: Inconsistency with repeated
fields using C++ protobufs
http://code.google.com/p/protobuf/issues/detail?id=286
ok thanks for your answer. Have you scheduled a release date ?
With the new implementation, what will be the impact for the end user ?
