On Oct 31, 5:19 am, Petar Petrov [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Yes, there are plans to improve performance. I have spent a little time on
this without significant improvements.
I think performance can hardly get a drastic improvement without a C++
extension module (which we are planning to have).
On Nov 8, 2:06 pm, Kenton Varda [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
1. XML vs. Yet-Another-Proprietary-File-Format
The arguments against using XML at the wire-level are well documented,
but why, oh why, couldn't you have made the message definition format
(.proto) XML-based?
Because XML is too
On Nov 20, 7:58 am, Kenton Varda [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
I'm not sure I understand. There's nothing stopping you from spreading your
definitions out among multiple .proto files which import each other, and
there's nothing stopping you from exporting multiple services from a single
server.
Thank you Kenton Shane - it must have been a slow brain day for me
yesterday :-)
I confused the underlying implementation with what PB provides. The
RPC system doesn't know or care how data is transferred.
On Nov 20, 5:56 pm, Shane Green [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
It sounds like the system in
