Comment #14 on issue 59 by t.broyer: Add another option to support
java_implement_interface
http://code.google.com/p/protobuf/issues/detail?id=59
@kenton: neat idea! and it's not necessarily too late to add this as an
alternate API
to the existing writeTo/parseFrom/mergeFrom methods, to sho
Comment #13 on issue 59 by aantono: Add another option to support
java_implement_interface
http://code.google.com/p/protobuf/issues/detail?id=59
just an FYI, as its mentioned in issue 82, there is already a set
of "formatters" for JSON, XML, etc, as part of the
http://code.google.com/p/pro
Comment #12 on issue 59 by ken...@google.com: Add another option to support
java_implement_interface
http://code.google.com/p/protobuf/issues/detail?id=59
For the alternate codec case, I think a better approach would be to
generate a
separate class to perform the encoding/decoding. E.g.:
Comment #11 on issue 59 by t.broyer: Add another option to support
java_implement_interface
http://code.google.com/p/protobuf/issues/detail?id=59
Attached is a patch that adds insertion points (Java only) for code
generator
plugins. It uses a redundant but harmless "implements Message(Lite)
