Re: [protobuf] Additional data types

2014-02-25 Thread Igor Gatis
riginal Message- > From: Christopher Smith [mailto:cbs...@gmail.com ] > Sent: Thursday, April 05, 2012 12:58 AM > To: Jawaid Hakim > Cc: Alexandru Turc; Protocol Buffers > Subject: Re: [protobuf] Additional data types > > Nothing prevents you from making a module available

RE: [protobuf] Additional data types

2012-04-05 Thread Jawaid Hakim
--Original Message- From: Christopher Smith [mailto:cbsm...@gmail.com] Sent: Thursday, April 05, 2012 12:58 AM To: Jawaid Hakim Cc: Alexandru Turc; Protocol Buffers Subject: Re: [protobuf] Additional data types Nothing prevents you from making a module available for everyone's benefit. If

Re: [protobuf] Additional data types

2012-04-04 Thread Christopher Smith
On Apr 4, 2012, at 2:54 PM, Jawaid Hakim wrote: > My group builds applications using use multiple languages, including Java and > C#, so a simple int64 for date representation does not work. That there isn't a simple way to do it is a pretty nasty strike against having a standard implementati

Re: [protobuf] Additional data types

2012-04-04 Thread Christopher Smith
exandru Turc [mailto:alex.t...@gmail.com] > Sent: Wednesday, April 04, 2012 5:09 PM > To: Jawaid Hakim > Cc: Protocol Buffers > Subject: Re: [protobuf] Additional data types > > > proto files are mapped to many languages, Date and BigDecimal are java > specific. > >

Re: [protobuf] Additional data types

2012-04-04 Thread Christopher Smith
AFAIK the answer is no. A lot of the value of protocol buffers derives from keeping their functionality simple. There are plenty of all singing/all dancing serialization frameworks already. ;-) I think date in particular is fraught with peril. I'd recommend against encodung them as strings. Wha

RE: [protobuf] Additional data types

2012-04-04 Thread Jawaid Hakim
, April 04, 2012 5:42 PM To: Jawaid Hakim Cc: Protocol Buffers Subject: Re: [protobuf] Additional data types What would be the mapping for C or C++? I think there is an advantage of keeping the set of data types very limited, to primitive values which can be easily mapped to multiple languages

RE: [protobuf] Additional data types

2012-04-04 Thread Jawaid Hakim
Wednesday, April 04, 2012 5:09 PM To: Jawaid Hakim Cc: Protocol Buffers Subject: Re: [protobuf] Additional data types proto files are mapped to many languages, Date and BigDecimal are java specific. On Apr 4, 2012, at 9:37 AM, jhakim wrote: > Any plans to provide out-of-the-box for common

Re: [protobuf] Additional data types

2012-04-04 Thread Alexandru Turc
waid Hakim > Chief Technology Officer > CodeStreet LLC > 646 442 2804 > www.codestreet.com > > > > > -Original Message- > From: Alexandru Turc [mailto:alex.t...@gmail.com] > Sent: Wednesday, April 04, 2012 5:09 PM > To: Jawaid Hakim > Cc: Protocol Buffer

Re: [protobuf] Additional data types

2012-04-04 Thread Alexandru Turc
proto files are mapped to many languages, Date and BigDecimal are java specific. On Apr 4, 2012, at 9:37 AM, jhakim wrote: > Any plans to provide out-of-the-box for commonly used data types such > as Date (encoded as String) and BigDecimal/BigInteger types? Seems > this would be of interest to