Re: [protobuf] protocol buffers performance

2013-01-24 Thread Feng Xiao
On Friday, January 25, 2013 11:18:46 AM UTC+8, kira kk wrote: > > Thanks *Marc. Before I run some trial tests. May you advise some benefit > of using protocal buffer instead of a collection of primitive data type.* > To name some of the benefits (over using primitive data types): 1. Backward co

Re: [protobuf] protocol buffers performance

2013-01-24 Thread kira kk
Thanks *Marc. Before I run some trial tests. May you advise some benefit of using protocal buffer instead of a collection of primitive data type.* * * *Kira * On 24 January 2013 15:40, Marc Gravell wrote: > Exact performance is very implementation- / application-specific. Yes, > protobuf will b

Re: [protobuf] Protocol buffers performance in python

2010-01-20 Thread Kenton Varda
In 2.3.0, the Python implementation is now 10x-25x faster than it used to be. However, as the implementation is pure-python, it is still much slower than C++. Petar (author of much of the Python code) is currently working on a version of the Python implementation which wraps the C++ library in th