Hi,
Kenton Varda schrieb am 02.09.2009 19:07:38:
> Sorry, automake does not make it easy to install only part of the
package,
> and I think it is non-trivial to get working libraries without running
the
> "install" step. Is there any harm in building protoc?
No, not really except build per
Sorry, automake does not make it easy to install only part of the package,
and I think it is non-trivial to get working libraries without running the
"install" step. Is there any harm in building protoc?
On Wed, Sep 2, 2009 at 12:53 AM, Makulik wrote:
>
> Hi Kenton,
>
> Thanks for your hints. Bu
Hi Kenton,
Thanks for your hints. But there's still one thing not clear for me:
I don't need the protoc compiler as powerpc executable, just the
runtime libs. Is there a way to give an option (build-target) to
configure
or make, to build just theese? I didn't see one after having a quick
look
on
Use the --with-protoc option to configure to tell it to use a particular
protoc binary when building (rather than attempt to execute the one it just
built).
Other than that, cross-compiling works the same as with any
automake/autoconf package. E.g. I have cross-compiled Windows binaries on a
Mac m
