[jira] [Commented] (PROTON-817) BlockingConnection doesn't pass options down in create_sender or create_receiver

2015-02-06 Thread ASF subversion and git services (JIRA)
[ https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/PROTON-817?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanelfocusedCommentId=14308913#comment-14308913 ] ASF subversion and git services commented on PROTON-817: Commit

[jira] [Resolved] (PROTON-817) BlockingConnection doesn't pass options down in create_sender or create_receiver

2015-02-06 Thread Gordon Sim (JIRA)
[ https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/PROTON-817?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:all-tabpanel ] Gordon Sim resolved PROTON-817. --- Resolution: Fixed BlockingConnection doesn't pass options down in create_sender or create_receiver

[jira] [Commented] (PROTON-775) ruby: message annotations send from a ruby client are invalid

2015-02-06 Thread ASF subversion and git services (JIRA)
[ https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/PROTON-775?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanelfocusedCommentId=14309157#comment-14309157 ] ASF subversion and git services commented on PROTON-775: Commit

Re: [Fwd: [jira] [Commented] (DISPATCH-103) Websocket Listeners]

2015-02-06 Thread Alan Conway
On Fri, 2015-02-06 at 08:19 -0500, Rafael Schloming wrote: A couple of questions/comments inline, but first off, any reason this isn't on the list? (I don't mind, just curious.) No good reason, including list now. Extremely useful discussion, thanks! Taking it all on board. New question: For

Re: Ruby, Proton Engine and Records

2015-02-06 Thread Darryl L. Pierce
On Fri, Feb 06, 2015 at 08:37:07AM -0500, Rafael Schloming wrote: Is this the approach you referenced in your other email? (Same request here for a pointer to the highlighted key bits of the approach.) No, this was a third approach to the problem, since we can't directly affect the object

Re: Proton-c Websocket Listeners - thread from off list discussion

2015-02-06 Thread Rafael Schloming
On Fri, Feb 6, 2015 at 8:54 AM, Fraser Adams fraser.ad...@blueyonder.co.uk wrote: It sounds like we quite probably would want to keep any web socket stuff compile-time optional and simply not build it at all with emscripten. That would a) avoid the possibility of nested websocketry, and b)

[jira] [Resolved] (PROTON-775) ruby: message annotations send from a ruby client are invalid

2015-02-06 Thread Darryl L. Pierce (JIRA)
[ https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/PROTON-775?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:all-tabpanel ] Darryl L. Pierce resolved PROTON-775. - Resolution: Fixed Fix Version/s: 0.9 ruby: message annotations send from a ruby

[jira] [Updated] (PROTON-775) ruby: message annotations send from a ruby client are invalid

2015-02-06 Thread Darryl L. Pierce (JIRA)
[ https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/PROTON-775?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:all-tabpanel ] Darryl L. Pierce updated PROTON-775: Attachment: 0001-PROTON-775-Ensure-that-annotation-keys-in-Ruby-are-e.patch This patch

Re: Non-reactive engine examples?

2015-02-06 Thread Rafael Schloming
On Tue, Feb 3, 2015 at 4:26 PM, Darryl L. Pierce dpie...@redhat.com wrote: On Mon, Feb 02, 2015 at 09:12:22AM -0500, Darryl L. Pierce wrote: Are there any example apps for Python that don't use the reactive APIs? If no examples, perhaps a primer of how the logical components of the enger

Re: Ruby memory management (was: Ruby and the Engine APIs)

2015-02-06 Thread Rafael Schloming
On Fri, Jan 30, 2015 at 10:40 AM, Darryl L. Pierce dpie...@redhat.com wrote: On Wed, Jan 28, 2015 at 01:22:45PM -0500, Rafael Schloming wrote: snip Also, have you been able to validate your testing strategy for either/both of these POCs? Can you generate seg faults and/or valgrind warnings

Re: Ruby, Proton Engine and Records

2015-02-06 Thread Rafael Schloming
Is this the approach you referenced in your other email? (Same request here for a pointer to the highlighted key bits of the approach.) On Fri, Jan 30, 2015 at 4:11 PM, Darryl L. Pierce dpie...@redhat.com wrote: So over the last week I've been working on a way to avoid leaking memory or

Proton-c Websocket Listeners - thread from off list discussion

2015-02-06 Thread Fraser Adams
Couple of replies inline. On 06/02/15 13:19, Rafael Schloming wrote: A couple of questions/comments inline, but first off, any reason this isn't on the list? (I don't mind, just curious.) No good reason; Alan PMed me and I replied, then though I'd best copy you guys. It's slightly head

[jira] [Commented] (PROTON-775) ruby: message annotations send from a ruby client are invalid

2015-02-06 Thread Dominic Evans (JIRA)
[ https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/PROTON-775?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanelfocusedCommentId=14309067#comment-14309067 ] Dominic Evans commented on PROTON-775: -- [~mcpierce] do you have any thoughts of how

[jira] [Assigned] (PROTON-775) ruby: message annotations send from a ruby client are invalid

2015-02-06 Thread Darryl L. Pierce (JIRA)
[ https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/PROTON-775?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:all-tabpanel ] Darryl L. Pierce reassigned PROTON-775: --- Assignee: Darryl L. Pierce ruby: message annotations send from a ruby client are

Re: [Fwd: [jira] [Commented] (DISPATCH-103) Websocket Listeners]

2015-02-06 Thread Rafael Schloming
On Fri, Feb 6, 2015 at 9:28 AM, Alan Conway acon...@redhat.com wrote: On Fri, 2015-02-06 at 08:19 -0500, Rafael Schloming wrote: A couple of questions/comments inline, but first off, any reason this isn't on the list? (I don't mind, just curious.) No good reason, including list now.

Re: request/response stuff has broken the java build

2015-02-06 Thread Alan Conway
On Thu, 2015-01-29 at 12:13 -0500, Rafael Schloming wrote: On Thu, Jan 29, 2015 at 11:42 AM, Andrew Stitcher astitc...@redhat.com wrote: On Wed, 2015-01-28 at 16:09 -0500, Alan Conway wrote: On Tue, 2015-01-27 at 09:46 -0500, Rafael Schloming wrote: Do you have tracing turned on when