[jira] [Commented] (PROTON-881) Proton-j reactor implementation

[ https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/PROTON-881?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanelfocusedCommentId=14588004#comment-14588004 ] ASF GitHub Bot commented on PROTON-881: --- Github user prestona commented on the pull

[GitHub] qpid-proton pull request: PROTON-881: Graceful handling of runtime...

Github user prestona commented on the pull request: https://github.com/apache/qpid-proton/pull/37#issuecomment-112419828 (Not sure what is happening with the Travis CI build - as I can't reproduce the test case failure if I pull the reactor branch and build locally) --- If your

[jira] [Commented] (PROTON-895) Rely on python to build the downloaded tarball

[ https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/PROTON-895?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanelfocusedCommentId=14588283#comment-14588283 ] ASF subversion and git services commented on PROTON-895: Commit

[jira] [Commented] (PROTON-887) Windows SSL implementation needs working version of pn_ssl_get_remote_subject()

[ https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/PROTON-887?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanelfocusedCommentId=14588135#comment-14588135 ] ASF subversion and git services commented on PROTON-887: Commit

[jira] [Commented] (PROTON-909) Tests for new SASL features and mechanisms

[ https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/PROTON-909?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanelfocusedCommentId=14588573#comment-14588573 ] ASF subversion and git services commented on PROTON-909: Commit

[jira] [Commented] (PROTON-908) Use swig as a build dependency when possible

[ https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/PROTON-908?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanelfocusedCommentId=14588545#comment-14588545 ] ASF subversion and git services commented on PROTON-908: Commit

Re: Python 3 port is 'done'

On 8 May 2015 at 13:34, Rafael Schloming r...@alum.mit.edu wrote: On Thu, Apr 30, 2015 at 11:18 AM, Robbie Gemmell robbie.gemm...@gmail.com wrote: On 30 April 2015 at 15:56, Ken Giusti kgiu...@redhat.com wrote: - Original Message - From: Robbie Gemmell robbie.gemm...@gmail.com

[jira] [Commented] (PROTON-862) Proton using Cyrus SASL library is problematic because the library has global state

[ https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/PROTON-862?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanelfocusedCommentId=14588574#comment-14588574 ] ASF subversion and git services commented on PROTON-862: Commit

Re: Python 3 port is 'done'

On 30/04/15 11:08 -0400, Ken Giusti wrote: - Original Message - From: Ken Giusti kgiu...@redhat.com To: proton@qpid.apache.org Cc: us...@qpid.apache.org Sent: Thursday, April 30, 2015 9:18:26 AM Subject: Re: Python 3 port is 'done' - Original Message - From: Rafael

Can we release proton 0.10? Can we add Py3K to that release?

Greetings, I've been looking with great pleasure all the progress happening in proton lately and I was wondering whether it'd be possible to have an 0.10 release cut soon. There are some bugfixes I'm personally interested in but also some important changes (specifically in the python bindings)

Re: Can we release proton 0.10? Can we add Py3K to that release?

I'd like to get the proton-j-reactor branch into 0.10 also. It should be ready soon, so if py3k can be sorted and merged in a similar timeframe we could target a release for the end of the month. --Rafael On Tue, Jun 16, 2015 at 3:32 PM, Flavio Percoco fla...@redhat.com wrote: Greetings,