Thanks!
Bozzo
On 24. 10. 13 17:06, Rafael Schloming wrote:
They look pretty straightforward, I don't see why we can't get them into
0.6.
--Rafael
On Thu, Oct 24, 2013 at 7:26 AM, Bozo Dragojevic wrote:
On 23. 10. 13 13:10, Rafael Schloming wrote:
Hi Everyone,
There have been a bunch of
They look pretty straightforward, I don't see why we can't get them into
0.6.
--Rafael
On Thu, Oct 24, 2013 at 7:26 AM, Bozo Dragojevic wrote:
> On 23. 10. 13 13:10, Rafael Schloming wrote:
>
>> Hi Everyone,
>>
>> There have been a bunch of good fixes and improvements on trunk since 0.5,
>> an
On 23. 10. 13 13:10, Rafael Schloming wrote:
Hi Everyone,
There have been a bunch of good fixes and improvements on trunk since 0.5,
and we now have a dwindling number of JIRAs slated for 0.6, so it's
probably time to start thinking about another release. I believe right now
there are 7 outstand
On Wed, Oct 23, 2013 at 8:53 AM, Ken Giusti wrote:
> Hi Rafi,
>
> I'd like to get PROTON-200 finished for 0.6, which involves porting the
> algorithm in the C implementation of Messenger to the Java implementation.
> This port is dependent on PROTON-444, so I'd like to include that in 0.6
> also
From: "Rafael Schloming"
> To: proton@qpid.apache.org
> Sent: Wednesday, October 23, 2013 7:10:59 AM
> Subject: 0.6 Release/0.7 Planning
>
> Hi Everyone,
>
> There have been a bunch of good fixes and improvements on trunk since 0.5,
> and we now have a dwindling num
Hi Everyone,
There have been a bunch of good fixes and improvements on trunk since 0.5,
and we now have a dwindling number of JIRAs slated for 0.6, so it's
probably time to start thinking about another release. I believe right now
there are 7 outstanding 0.6 JIRAs. (Please give a shout if there ar
