On Thu, Oct 25, 2012 at 08:38:04PM -0400, Rafael Schloming wrote:
> I put up an RC6 here[1] with the java shim fixed so the SSL tests skip
> properly. That's the only change from RC5.
>
> [1] http://people.apache.org/~rhs/qpid-proton-0.1rc6/
Packages build fine locally (F17
way
> > and using the new system they put in place for distribution via
> > https://people.apache.org/keys/).
> >
> > Robbie
> >
> > On 26 October 2012 02:05, Rajith Attapattu wrote:
> >
> > > Sorry I should have done this before you posted RC6 :(
>
r example.
>
> (Aside: we should probably be transitioning away from the KEYS file anyway
> and using the new system they put in place for distribution via
> https://people.apache.org/keys/).
>
> Robbie
>
> On 26 October 2012 02:05, Rajith Attapattu wrote:
>
> > Sorry I s
pattu wrote:
>
>> Sorry I should have done this before you posted RC6 :(
>> We have a few files (mostly java files) that are missing license headers.
>> Please look at the RAT output I posted.
>>
>> Once the final RC is voted, the release manager (in this case Rafi)
&
distribution via
https://people.apache.org/keys/).
Robbie
On 26 October 2012 02:05, Rajith Attapattu wrote:
> Sorry I should have done this before you posted RC6 :(
> We have a few files (mostly java files) that are missing license headers.
> Please look at the RAT output I posted.
>
>
Sorry I should have done this before you posted RC6 :(
We have a few files (mostly java files) that are missing license headers.
Please look at the RAT output I posted.
Once the final RC is voted, the release manager (in this case Rafi)
will have to sign the final artefacts.
You already have your
I put up an RC6 here[1] with the java shim fixed so the SSL tests skip
properly. That's the only change from RC5.
[1] http://people.apache.org/~rhs/qpid-proton-0.1rc6/
--Rafael
