On Wed, 2012-12-05 at 17:51 -0500, Rafael Schloming wrote:
On Wed, Dec 5, 2012 at 4:38 PM, Darryl L. Pierce dpie...@redhat.com wrote:
I disagree:
There are two scenarios that we care about:
1. The install prefix of proton is the same as the install prefix of the
perl/php/etc.
In this case
On Thu, Dec 6, 2012 at 1:05 PM, Andrew Stitcher astitc...@redhat.comwrote:
On Wed, 2012-12-05 at 17:51 -0500, Rafael Schloming wrote:
On Wed, Dec 5, 2012 at 4:38 PM, Darryl L. Pierce dpie...@redhat.com
wrote:
I disagree:
Are you disagreeing with me or Darryl or both? ;-)
There are two
On Thu, 2012-12-06 at 13:24 -0500, Rafael Schloming wrote:
...
The best way to cater to the developer scenario you mention is to simply
look at install_manifest.txt. This file is generated whenever you type make
install and will provide a much more accurate check on whether the install
is
On Thu, 2012-12-06 at 13:35 -0500, Andrew Stitcher wrote:
On Thu, 2012-12-06 at 13:24 -0500, Rafael Schloming wrote:
...
The best way to cater to the developer scenario you mention is to simply
look at install_manifest.txt. This file is generated whenever you type make
install and will
On Thu, Dec 6, 2012 at 1:35 PM, Andrew Stitcher astitc...@redhat.comwrote:
On Thu, 2012-12-06 at 13:24 -0500, Rafael Schloming wrote:
...
The best way to cater to the developer scenario you mention is to simply
look at install_manifest.txt. This file is generated whenever you type
make
