You're invited to be a moderator on Omniref

Hi, I'm building a Ruby documentation community that allows users to ask questions about code and help generate documentation. Since you're a gem creator, I'd like to offer you moderation controls which allow you to edit or delete comments on your gem. You can claim your privileges here:

[jira] [Commented] (PROTON-784) Settled Deliveries keep piling up, and do not seem to get freed from heap

[ https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/PROTON-784?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanelfocusedCommentId=14266036#comment-14266036 ] Rafael H. Schloming commented on PROTON-784: I don't mean to suggest there

[jira] [Commented] (PROTON-791) c-reactor-tests fails because it listens to an IPv4 socket but connects to an IPv6 socket

[ https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/PROTON-791?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanelfocusedCommentId=14266053#comment-14266053 ] Rafael H. Schloming commented on PROTON-791: The reactor code is just

[jira] [Commented] (PROTON-791) c-reactor-tests fails because it listens to an IPv4 socket but connects to an IPv6 socket

[ https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/PROTON-791?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanelfocusedCommentId=14266135#comment-14266135 ] Andrew Stitcher commented on PROTON-791: Ah the specified addresses will be the

[jira] [Commented] (PROTON-791) c-reactor-tests fails because it listens to an IPv4 socket but connects to an IPv6 socket

[ https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/PROTON-791?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanelfocusedCommentId=14266237#comment-14266237 ] Rafael H. Schloming commented on PROTON-791: Do you know offhand which option

Re: Proton 0.9 alpha 1

Built and installed on a Fedora 20 x64 VM just fine. The ruby-spec-test failed on my first run of the tests. I couldn't reproduce the failure again after that, and I didn't get any debug-able info on the first failure. Just fyi. Ran the existing pyngus unit tests and examples against the

Re: [java] Message codec improvements

Thanks Rafi, for the link. I agree that any work should use this as a basis. I plan to take a closer look at this in the next week or so. Rajith On Wed, Dec 17, 2014 at 1:24 PM, Rafael Schloming r...@alum.mit.edu wrote: A while back I implemented a relatively complete standalone codec here:

[jira] [Resolved] (PROTON-791) c-reactor-tests fails because it listens to an IPv4 socket but connects to an IPv6 socket

[ https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/PROTON-791?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:all-tabpanel ] Rafael H. Schloming resolved PROTON-791. Resolution: Fixed c-reactor-tests fails because it listens to an IPv4 socket but

[jira] [Commented] (PROTON-791) c-reactor-tests fails because it listens to an IPv4 socket but connects to an IPv6 socket

[ https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/PROTON-791?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanelfocusedCommentId=14266273#comment-14266273 ] Andrew Stitcher commented on PROTON-791: I think using IPv4 is likely to be more

[jira] [Commented] (PROTON-711) [contrib/proton-jms] add support to message transformers for more efficient destination type annotation value

[ https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/PROTON-711?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanelfocusedCommentId=14266464#comment-14266464 ] Robbie Gemmell commented on PROTON-711: --- Per the above, the bulk of the changes here

[jira] [Created] (PROTON-792) [contrib/proton-jms] remove stale support of byte destination type annotation from message transformers

Robbie Gemmell created PROTON-792: - Summary: [contrib/proton-jms] remove stale support of byte destination type annotation from message transformers Key: PROTON-792 URL: