On Tue, Dec 18, 2012 at 3:21 PM, Justin Ross wrote:Types
>
>>> pn_disposition_t
>>>
>>> Existing C name:pn_disposition_t
>>> Proposed C name:
>>> Existing Java name: DeliveryState
>>> Proposed Java name: Disposition
>>>
>>> DeliveryState vs. Disposition. A good example
On Thu, 20 Dec 2012, Rafael Schloming wrote:
On Tue, Dec 18, 2012 at 2:58 PM, Justin Ross wrote:
On Fri, 14 Dec 2012, Rafael Schloming wrote:
On Thu, Dec 13, 2012 at 5:37 PM, Justin wrote:
I've found the whole process of proposing API review dispiriting. You
can, of course, take it o
On Tue, Dec 18, 2012 at 2:58 PM, Justin Ross wrote:
> On Fri, 14 Dec 2012, Rafael Schloming wrote:
>
> On Thu, Dec 13, 2012 at 5:37 PM, Justin wrote:
>>
>> I've found the whole process of proposing API review dispiriting. You
>>> can, of course, take it or leave it. I in no way wish to claim
Comments below.
On Fri, 14 Dec 2012, Rafael Schloming wrote:
On Thu, Dec 13, 2012 at 5:37 PM, Justin wrote:
API usability is important and deserves attention.
Take, for instance, DeliveryState versus Disposition. That only serves to
confuse people. It's a difference that has no content.
On Fri, 14 Dec 2012, Rafael Schloming wrote:
On Thu, Dec 13, 2012 at 5:37 PM, Justin wrote:
I've found the whole process of proposing API review dispiriting. You
can, of course, take it or leave it. I in no way wish to claim I have
better choices. I only wish to point out things that might
On Fri, 14 Dec 2012, Rob Godfrey wrote:
On 14 December 2012 01:02, Weston M. Price wrote:
On things such as bitmaps vs. enums, I think that's just a language
convention thing... I don't see a huge need to make such things
identical.
Naming is something that should be aligned between APIs
On Fri, 14 Dec 2012, Rob Godfrey wrote:
A couple of comments...
On 13 December 2012 23:37, Justin wrote:
API usability is important and deserves attention.
pn_link_drain
Existing C name:pn_link_drain
Proposed C name:pn_link_rescind_credit
Existing Java name: Re
On Thu, Dec 13, 2012 at 5:37 PM, Justin wrote:
> API usability is important and deserves attention.
>
> Take, for instance, DeliveryState versus Disposition. That only serves to
> confuse people. It's a difference that has no content. I also think
> link.drained and link.offered are very uncl
On Thu, Dec 13, 2012 at 5:37 PM, Justin wrote:
> I've found the whole process of proposing API review dispiriting. You
> can, of course, take it or leave it. I in no way wish to claim I have
> better choices. I only wish to point out things that might deserve more
> deliberation.
>
Can you pl
On Dec 13, 2012, at 7:23 PM, Rob Godfrey wrote:
> On 14 December 2012 01:02, Weston M. Price wrote:
>
>>
>> On Dec 13, 2012, at 6:22 PM, Rob Godfrey wrote:
>>
>>> A couple of comments...
>>>
>>> On 13 December 2012 23:37, Justin wrote:
>>>
API usability is important and deserves att
On 14 December 2012 01:02, Weston M. Price wrote:
>
> On Dec 13, 2012, at 6:22 PM, Rob Godfrey wrote:
>
> > A couple of comments...
> >
> > On 13 December 2012 23:37, Justin wrote:
> >
> >> API usability is important and deserves attention.
> >>
> >>
> >
> >
> >
> >>
> >> pn_link_drain
> >>
>
On Dec 13, 2012, at 6:22 PM, Rob Godfrey wrote:
> A couple of comments...
>
> On 13 December 2012 23:37, Justin wrote:
>
>> API usability is important and deserves attention.
>>
>>
>
>
>
>>
>> pn_link_drain
>>
>>Existing C name:pn_link_drain
>>Proposed C name:pn_link_r
A couple of comments...
On 13 December 2012 23:37, Justin wrote:
> API usability is important and deserves attention.
>
>
>
> pn_link_drain
>
> Existing C name:pn_link_drain
> Proposed C name:pn_link_rescind_credit
> Existing Java name: Receiver.drain
> Proposed Java
Nice suggestions actually. I think some of the discrepancy has to do with the
difference between languages and the idioms that have long been fossilized int
the different naming conventions.
Again, all suggestions on proposed look good to me.
Regards,
-W
On Dec 13, 2012, at 5:37 PM, Justin
14 matches
Mail list logo
