Re: Maven Deployment of 0.4 Release

2013-05-25 Thread Rafael Schloming
On Fri, May 24, 2013 at 8:28 AM, Robbie Gemmell wrote:

> I guess somone forgot to click the release button while doing all the other
> distribution steps? ;)
>

Must be. ;-)

I have a script fragment somewhere that is supposed to be able to automate
that part. I'll see if I can improve the process a bit next time around.

--Rafael


Re: Maven Deployment of 0.4 Release

2013-05-25 Thread Hiram Chirino
Thanks!

On Fri, May 24, 2013 at 8:28 AM, Robbie Gemmell
 wrote:
> I guess somone forgot to click the release button while doing all the other
> distribution steps? ;)
>
> I have just clicked the release button for you, the artifacts should show
> up on Maven Central after the next sync. I also dropped the older stale RCs
> that had been left behind as well.
>
> Robbie
>
> On 24 May 2013 11:30, Rafael Schloming  wrote:
>
>> +1
>>
>> That should have happened during the actual release. I'm not sure why it
>> didn't.
>>
>> --Rafael
>>
>>
>> On Thu, May 23, 2013 at 7:11 PM, Robbie Gemmell > >wrote:
>>
>> > There is a staging repo on repository.apache.org that appears to have
>> the
>> > 0.4 release artifacts in it and simply wasn't released at the time.
>> >
>> > The files contain the changes from the last change that seems to have
>> gone
>> > into 0.4 (http://svn.apache.org/r1448733), building a copy of the 0.4
>> > source locally and diffing the contents resulted in no differences within
>> > the contained java class files, and the timestamps seem to align when
>> > accounting for known timezones at the point the release was built. There
>> > were differences in some of the metadata files(timestamps, maven+jvm
>> > versions etc, i.e to be expected), and the the staged 'tests.jar' file
>> > contains $py.class files for the python tests.
>> >
>> > Does it seem acceptable to everyone to simply promote those
>> > previously-staged artifacts now?
>> >
>> > Robbie
>> >
>> > On 23 May 2013 14:45, Phil Harvey  wrote:
>> >
>> > > Hi Hiram,
>> > >
>> > > Did you ever get a reply about this (e.g. on the IRC channel)?
>> > >
>> > > I think Rafi created the 0.4 release candidate but I don't know if
>> > there's
>> > > a specific reason why it hasn't been promoted.
>> > >
>> > > Rafi - can you shed any light on this?  I'm happy to lend a hand if
>> > > anything needs doing.
>> > >
>> > > Phil
>> > >
>> > >
>> > >
>> > > On 20 May 2013 15:09, Hiram Chirino  wrote:
>> > >
>> > > > I don't see the 0.4 release in maven central:
>> > > >
>> > > > http://repo2.maven.org/maven2/org/apache/qpid/proton-api/
>> > > >
>> > > > Can you guy make sure that a maven deployment is part of the release
>> > > > process?
>> > > >
>> > > > --
>> > > > Hiram Chirino
>> > > >
>> > > > Engineering | Red Hat, Inc.
>> > > >
>> > > > hchir...@redhat.com | fusesource.com | redhat.com
>> > > >
>> > > > skype: hiramchirino | twitter: @hiramchirino
>> > > >
>> > > > blog: Hiram Chirino's Bit Mojo
>> > > >
>> > >
>> >
>>



-- 
Hiram Chirino

Engineering | Red Hat, Inc.

hchir...@redhat.com | fusesource.com | redhat.com

skype: hiramchirino | twitter: @hiramchirino

blog: Hiram Chirino's Bit Mojo


Re: Maven Deployment of 0.4 Release

2013-05-24 Thread Robbie Gemmell
I guess somone forgot to click the release button while doing all the other
distribution steps? ;)

I have just clicked the release button for you, the artifacts should show
up on Maven Central after the next sync. I also dropped the older stale RCs
that had been left behind as well.

Robbie

On 24 May 2013 11:30, Rafael Schloming  wrote:

> +1
>
> That should have happened during the actual release. I'm not sure why it
> didn't.
>
> --Rafael
>
>
> On Thu, May 23, 2013 at 7:11 PM, Robbie Gemmell  >wrote:
>
> > There is a staging repo on repository.apache.org that appears to have
> the
> > 0.4 release artifacts in it and simply wasn't released at the time.
> >
> > The files contain the changes from the last change that seems to have
> gone
> > into 0.4 (http://svn.apache.org/r1448733), building a copy of the 0.4
> > source locally and diffing the contents resulted in no differences within
> > the contained java class files, and the timestamps seem to align when
> > accounting for known timezones at the point the release was built. There
> > were differences in some of the metadata files(timestamps, maven+jvm
> > versions etc, i.e to be expected), and the the staged 'tests.jar' file
> > contains $py.class files for the python tests.
> >
> > Does it seem acceptable to everyone to simply promote those
> > previously-staged artifacts now?
> >
> > Robbie
> >
> > On 23 May 2013 14:45, Phil Harvey  wrote:
> >
> > > Hi Hiram,
> > >
> > > Did you ever get a reply about this (e.g. on the IRC channel)?
> > >
> > > I think Rafi created the 0.4 release candidate but I don't know if
> > there's
> > > a specific reason why it hasn't been promoted.
> > >
> > > Rafi - can you shed any light on this?  I'm happy to lend a hand if
> > > anything needs doing.
> > >
> > > Phil
> > >
> > >
> > >
> > > On 20 May 2013 15:09, Hiram Chirino  wrote:
> > >
> > > > I don't see the 0.4 release in maven central:
> > > >
> > > > http://repo2.maven.org/maven2/org/apache/qpid/proton-api/
> > > >
> > > > Can you guy make sure that a maven deployment is part of the release
> > > > process?
> > > >
> > > > --
> > > > Hiram Chirino
> > > >
> > > > Engineering | Red Hat, Inc.
> > > >
> > > > hchir...@redhat.com | fusesource.com | redhat.com
> > > >
> > > > skype: hiramchirino | twitter: @hiramchirino
> > > >
> > > > blog: Hiram Chirino's Bit Mojo
> > > >
> > >
> >
>


Re: Maven Deployment of 0.4 Release

2013-05-24 Thread Rafael Schloming
+1

That should have happened during the actual release. I'm not sure why it
didn't.

--Rafael


On Thu, May 23, 2013 at 7:11 PM, Robbie Gemmell wrote:

> There is a staging repo on repository.apache.org that appears to have the
> 0.4 release artifacts in it and simply wasn't released at the time.
>
> The files contain the changes from the last change that seems to have gone
> into 0.4 (http://svn.apache.org/r1448733), building a copy of the 0.4
> source locally and diffing the contents resulted in no differences within
> the contained java class files, and the timestamps seem to align when
> accounting for known timezones at the point the release was built. There
> were differences in some of the metadata files(timestamps, maven+jvm
> versions etc, i.e to be expected), and the the staged 'tests.jar' file
> contains $py.class files for the python tests.
>
> Does it seem acceptable to everyone to simply promote those
> previously-staged artifacts now?
>
> Robbie
>
> On 23 May 2013 14:45, Phil Harvey  wrote:
>
> > Hi Hiram,
> >
> > Did you ever get a reply about this (e.g. on the IRC channel)?
> >
> > I think Rafi created the 0.4 release candidate but I don't know if
> there's
> > a specific reason why it hasn't been promoted.
> >
> > Rafi - can you shed any light on this?  I'm happy to lend a hand if
> > anything needs doing.
> >
> > Phil
> >
> >
> >
> > On 20 May 2013 15:09, Hiram Chirino  wrote:
> >
> > > I don't see the 0.4 release in maven central:
> > >
> > > http://repo2.maven.org/maven2/org/apache/qpid/proton-api/
> > >
> > > Can you guy make sure that a maven deployment is part of the release
> > > process?
> > >
> > > --
> > > Hiram Chirino
> > >
> > > Engineering | Red Hat, Inc.
> > >
> > > hchir...@redhat.com | fusesource.com | redhat.com
> > >
> > > skype: hiramchirino | twitter: @hiramchirino
> > >
> > > blog: Hiram Chirino's Bit Mojo
> > >
> >
>


Re: Maven Deployment of 0.4 Release

2013-05-23 Thread Robbie Gemmell
There is a staging repo on repository.apache.org that appears to have the
0.4 release artifacts in it and simply wasn't released at the time.

The files contain the changes from the last change that seems to have gone
into 0.4 (http://svn.apache.org/r1448733), building a copy of the 0.4
source locally and diffing the contents resulted in no differences within
the contained java class files, and the timestamps seem to align when
accounting for known timezones at the point the release was built. There
were differences in some of the metadata files(timestamps, maven+jvm
versions etc, i.e to be expected), and the the staged 'tests.jar' file
contains $py.class files for the python tests.

Does it seem acceptable to everyone to simply promote those
previously-staged artifacts now?

Robbie

On 23 May 2013 14:45, Phil Harvey  wrote:

> Hi Hiram,
>
> Did you ever get a reply about this (e.g. on the IRC channel)?
>
> I think Rafi created the 0.4 release candidate but I don't know if there's
> a specific reason why it hasn't been promoted.
>
> Rafi - can you shed any light on this?  I'm happy to lend a hand if
> anything needs doing.
>
> Phil
>
>
>
> On 20 May 2013 15:09, Hiram Chirino  wrote:
>
> > I don't see the 0.4 release in maven central:
> >
> > http://repo2.maven.org/maven2/org/apache/qpid/proton-api/
> >
> > Can you guy make sure that a maven deployment is part of the release
> > process?
> >
> > --
> > Hiram Chirino
> >
> > Engineering | Red Hat, Inc.
> >
> > hchir...@redhat.com | fusesource.com | redhat.com
> >
> > skype: hiramchirino | twitter: @hiramchirino
> >
> > blog: Hiram Chirino's Bit Mojo
> >
>


Re: Maven Deployment of 0.4 Release

2013-05-23 Thread Phil Harvey
Hi Hiram,

Did you ever get a reply about this (e.g. on the IRC channel)?

I think Rafi created the 0.4 release candidate but I don't know if there's
a specific reason why it hasn't been promoted.

Rafi - can you shed any light on this?  I'm happy to lend a hand if
anything needs doing.

Phil



On 20 May 2013 15:09, Hiram Chirino  wrote:

> I don't see the 0.4 release in maven central:
>
> http://repo2.maven.org/maven2/org/apache/qpid/proton-api/
>
> Can you guy make sure that a maven deployment is part of the release
> process?
>
> --
> Hiram Chirino
>
> Engineering | Red Hat, Inc.
>
> hchir...@redhat.com | fusesource.com | redhat.com
>
> skype: hiramchirino | twitter: @hiramchirino
>
> blog: Hiram Chirino's Bit Mojo
>