On Mon, 2015-02-16 at 17:47 -0500, Andrew Stitcher wrote:
> On Mon, 2015-02-16 at 14:32 -0500, Alan Conway wrote:
> > I work on a mix of SVN and GIT-based projects so I switch between trunk
> > and master a lot. Proton used to be an SVN based project. I repeatedly
> > stub my toe on the old "trunk"
On Mon, 2015-02-16 at 14:32 -0500, Alan Conway wrote:
> I work on a mix of SVN and GIT-based projects so I switch between trunk
> and master a lot. Proton used to be an SVN based project. I repeatedly
> stub my toe on the old "trunk" branch which has been left lying around
> with some random commit
On Mon, Feb 16, 2015 at 3:40 PM, Dominic Evans
wrote:
> Rafael Schloming wrote on 16/02/2015 20:02:07:
> >
> > On Mon, Feb 16, 2015 at 2:32 PM, Alan Conway wrote:
> >
> > > I work on a mix of SVN and GIT-based projects so I switch between
> trunk
> > > and master a lot. Proton used to be an SVN
Rafael Schloming wrote on 16/02/2015 20:02:07:
>
> On Mon, Feb 16, 2015 at 2:32 PM, Alan Conway wrote:
>
> > I work on a mix of SVN and GIT-based projects so I switch between
trunk
> > and master a lot. Proton used to be an SVN based project. I repeatedly
> > stub my toe on the old "trunk" bra
On 02/16/2015 03:02 PM, Rafael Schloming wrote:
I'm not much of a git expert, so I don't know what the preferred option
would be, but I'm +1 for killing it in one form or another.
--Rafael
You can submit a request to INFRA to drop it, the only caveat is that
there is no enforcement to prevent
I'm not much of a git expert, so I don't know what the preferred option
would be, but I'm +1 for killing it in one form or another.
--Rafael
On Mon, Feb 16, 2015 at 2:32 PM, Alan Conway wrote:
> I work on a mix of SVN and GIT-based projects so I switch between trunk
> and master a lot. Proton u
