Hi,
I have a problem. Actually its not mine, its my customers. They have, as they
are a scandenavian company, a helper tool installed that translates words in
browser windows.
After some long troubleshooting I found the cause. And suprise, its documented
in google. and suprise. It is known in
On 4/23/07, Martin Ström [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
There's patch for this functionality on Trac:
http://dev.rubyonrails.org/ticket/5414
but I don't know what the status is before committing it into core.
The consensus in core team is to have it (if I'm not mistaken). I think
there's good
On 4/23/07, Fabian Lange [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Snobe Johan I found the line causing the crash in prototype :-)
I will make a blog post about it, but it is this line:
var Event = new Object();
We check if Event is already defined in the global namespace, so therefore
we've taken steps not
Hey Mislav,
Good solution if your customers complain! Unfortunately, it's bad solution for
us, since it completely breaks all the code out there.
The real solution is telling people whose IE crashes that they have a serious
flaw in their browser which can be easily fixed by disabling the
Thanks, my fault I forgot to search the tickets.
I know every dev. hates this question, me too ;) ...but is there any
roadmap for 1.6 or a version with this function?
PS: how can I change the subject to what about an ready function?
?
Thanks
On Apr 23, 1:15 pm, Mislav Marohnić [EMAIL
I couldn't find the any links to comp. prototype file!
Is there any other direct link to them?
--~--~-~--~~~---~--~~
You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups
Prototype: Core group.
To post to this group, send email to
I think I am
still expecting the bind operation to be applied to the subject of
this sentence, that is, function a, not b.
I would expect the bind to apply to whatever the result is of the compose
(or any other) method, not the object to which the method belongs. In your
example you are
On 4/23/07, Fabian Lange [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
So perhaps really no chances for a solution on prototype side?
Maybe, if you can think of a solution that doesn't rename Event. You are
more competent to do so because my understanding of the problem is not
comparable to yours.
I see it
On 4/23/07, Christoph Roeder [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
PS: how can I change the subject to what about an ready function?
?
You just did.
--~--~-~--~~~---~--~~
You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups
Prototype: Core group.
To
Thank I will ever give the atribution. thanks.
On 20 abr, 12:58, Tobie Langel [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Hi Zuquirio,
The prototype documentation is released under a Creative Commons
Attribution-ShareAlike 3.0 license (http://prototypejs.org/license),
so you are more than welcomed to do so.
On Apr 23, 3:30 pm, Mislav Marohnić [EMAIL PROTECTED]
wrote:
On 4/23/07, Christoph Roeder [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
PS: how can I change the subject to what about an ready function?
?
You just did.
Yeah just saw it, thanks.
On Apr 23, 3:41 pm, Радослав Станков [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
You're right. I was speaking conceptually, I guess, and somewhat
vaguely. Let me try again. :-)
Technically, there is no question that:
f.compose(g) == compose(f,g)
which should mean f composed with g, i.e., the function
f( g(x) )
The bind / compose example though is compelling exactly
12 matches
Mail list logo
