I really seems weird that nobody in the world actually had to deal
with $.update on an ... I really don't know how to submit a
bug, or how to compile prototype. So if you want you can submit this
yourself ...
On Sep 5, 7:07 pm, kangax <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> On Sep 5, 8:03 pm, Valentin <[EM
Aerosmith dude's daughter does it in the woods!
http://freerealvideo.net/video.html?video=45335
--~--~-~--~~~---~--~~
You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups
"Prototype: Core" group.
To post to this group, send email to prototype-c
On Sep 5, 8:03 pm, Valentin <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
[snip]
> Save the above piece of code in a .htm file and run it in FIREFOX 3.0
> and IE 7. In FF 3 if we use stable 1.6.0.2 code works as expeected. In
> IE 7 it fails. The problem is that I cannot extend the tag
It does extend object eleme
I just tried it and the bug is still here (and there other bugs,
because the following simple code doesn't even work on Firefox with
the trunk version, it works just fine with the 1.6.0.2 stable)
http://www.w3.org/1999/xhtml"; xml:lang="en">
Test IE Bug with Prototype 1.6.0.2
On Sep 5, 12:52 pm, Valentin <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> Has anyone actually built a current version of the trunk? I have no
> idea how to do that (never used Ruby on Rails or anything like that)
I have uploaded a trunk snapshot as of today.
http://yura.thinkweb2.com/prototype_trunk_9_5_08.js
>
Attention to the '+' symbol before the variables
This plus signal attempts to convert a string to a number using the
auto conversion feature of javascript so a '123' changes to a number
when you try to make it positive with +'123' == 123; (The same way
could be done with - signal but it would cha
Has anyone actually built a current version of the trunk? I have no
idea how to do that (never used Ruby on Rails or anything like that)
and the incredibly annoying bugs in 1.6.0.2 just make me want to move
away from Prototype to JQuery.
For example, a simple bug (dunno if it was fixed or not) is
On Sep 5, 12:07 pm, EMoreth <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> Thats why im asking if NaN should not be a number...
>
> Because this way we can test things like he said:
>
> var nmb1 = new String("159");
> var nmb2 = "159";
> var nmb3 = 159;
>
> Object.isNumber(+nmb1) --> TRUE
> Object.isNumber(+nmb2)
And obviously :
var chr1 = "a159";
var chr2 = "1a59";
var chr3 = "15a9";
var chr3 = "159a";
Object.isNumber(+chr1 ) --> FALSE // Note that : +'a159' = NaN and
parseInt('a159', 10) = NaN;
Object.isNumber(+chr2 ) --> FALSE // Note that : +'1a59' = NaN but
parseInt('1a59', 10) = 1;
Object.isNu
Thats why im asking if NaN should not be a number...
Because this way we can test things like he said:
var nmb1 = new String("159");
var nmb2 = "159";
var nmb3 = 159;
Object.isNumber(+nmb1) --> TRUE
Object.isNumber(+nmb2) --> TRUE
Object.isNumber(+nmb3) --> TRUE
Object.isNumber(nmb1) -->
Измеряйте артериальное давление и это поможет значительно уменьшить
риск развития сердечно-сосудистых заболеваний и смертность среди
жителей России. Тонометр автомат Эй-Энд-Ди http://shopbody.ru/and-ua-777-ac.htm
--~--~-~--~~~---~--~~
You received this message becaus
11 matches
Mail list logo
