Hi folks,
Just trying to do a bit of tidying on the source[1], and unfortunately
I can't get PDoc working on my system and am a bit pressed for time
right now.
If you have PDoc working on your system, could you try running it
against the patched files on the linked ticket and seeing if it works
On Mar 24, 3:32 pm, Tobie Langel tobie.lan...@gmail.com wrote:
Unfortunately, a number of environments do not support eval and
decompiling function isn't part of any specification to date (nor
planned in the near future).
Best,
Tobie
Hey Tobie, those objections are well and good, but they
With JavaScript 1.6 we have the Array.map method to map a function to
each element in an array, and Prototype itself has invoke and pluck.
But what if you want to map a function to a set of parallel arrays,
where the elements in each array correspond to the arguments of the
function? It's a
Hi Robert,
For background, you might (if you haven't already) want to check out
these two threads from this group on this topic:
This short one:
http://groups.google.com/group/prototype-core/browse_thread/thread/d38f2123aa64eb0e/ac612b72cc060943
And this _rather_ more comprehensive one:
On Mar 25, 1:32 pm, Robert Kieffer bro...@gmail.com wrote:
Hey Tobie, those objections are well and good, but they can be
addressed (see below). I was hoping for feedback at a bit higher
level, on the overall idea. For example, does spinning off the native
APIs into a separate library
I'm glad Robert brought up this subject. I asked about this on IRC a
while back and the answer was that prototype was hand-crafted, is
beautiful the way it is, and that modifying it to pass strict syntax
checking would somehow make it slower...
I agree that there is some beautiful code in
Just had another thought -- it's possible to satisfy proponents of
both strict coding and quick downloads. Given a strictly written
program, it's possible to write a transformation to apply all the
syntax shortcuts to it and produce an equivalent lean version with
minimum whitespace and
