, as : Form.getUnputs('text',
'name*=XXX');
Is there a real glitch or it really is supposed to not work on form
Elements ??
Regards,
EMoreth
--~--~-~--~~~---~--~~
You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups
Prototype: Core group.
To post to this group
I solved that...
Sorry this was a code mistake... i don't know why but a function that
was called before used Element.remove() before this code and the
beginning of the code was still running...
EMoreth
On Oct 9, 9:01 pm, EMoreth [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
I couldnt reproduce the error out
).parentNode {object}DispHTMLDocument
The parent node of this item seem to be the same object that
document...
I dont know why this is happenning, i just AjaxLoaded the html and $
().updated on the page...
Any ideas now ??
Thanks
Emoreth
On Oct 3, 7:05 pm, kangax [EMAIL PROTECTED
posted because i had
to change it to post here... )
EMoreth
On Oct 2, 9:07 pm, kangax [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
On Oct 2, 6:37 pm, EMoreth [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
div class=messageItem id=someid
div class=messageTitle box_tittle
spanSome Text/span
().className messageItem
I am running Wndows XP SP2 on IE7
Some information more ?
EMoreth
On Oct 1, 5:10 pm, kangax [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
On Oct 1, 2:16 pm, EMoreth [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
This is the third time that this happens with me...
First o thought that was my
Sorry.. Last prototype distribution
EMoreth
On Oct 2, 7:37 pm, EMoreth [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
div class=messageItem id=someid
div class=messageTitle box_tittle
spanSome Text/span
input type=button value=Remover style=padding: 0px;
height
');
}
target.up('.messageItem') - undefined
target.up().up().up().up().up().up().up().className - 'messageItem'
It cant find the element even with a correct dom tree.. is there a
step number limitation or something ??
Thanks in advance...
EMoreth
--~--~-~--~~~---~--~~
You
Shouldnt it use the parent node of both elements ??
Cause if i decide to swap 'div1' and 'div2' here ill have no
nextSibling (assuming that no textNodes would be returned as
siblings)...
div
div
div id=div1/div
/div
div
div id=div2/div
/div
/div
EMoreth
On Sep 23, 5:04
Thanks a lot!!
This last example was very usefull ^^
EMoreth
On Sep 12, 8:08 am, T.J. Crowder [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
If you are searching for an Array.filter...
There's also Enumerable.inject (Array mixes in
Enumerable):http://www.prototypejs.org/api/enumerable/inject
I wouldn't want
good for people
who are used to other Typed Languages...
Please tell me what you think about that..
EMoreth
--~--~-~--~~~---~--~~
You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups
Prototype: Core group.
To post to this group, send email
Object.isNumber(nmb2) -- FALSE
Object.isNumber(nmb3) -- TRUE
I think that this should be the right behavior huh ??
EMoreth
On Sep 4, 8:34 am, kangax [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
On Sep 4, 5:18 am, Станислав Анисимов [EMAIL PROTECTED]
wrote:
Is't this a rigth way to define types:
111
(+chr3 ) -- FALSE // Note that : +'15a9' = NaN but
parseInt('15a9', 10) = 15;
Object.isNumber(+chr4 ) -- FALSE // Note that : +'159a' = NaN but
parseInt('159a', 10) = 159;
Sorry for double post...
A_r_e_s
On Sep 5, 1:07 pm, EMoreth [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Thats why im asking if NaN should
change the variable value)
But a +'123a' returns NaN because there is no way to make it positive
(different from parseInt that have a policy to get all numbers until a
non number character appears and than ignore all rest)
EMoreth
On Sep 5, 1:52 pm, kangax [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
On Sep 5, 12:07
Could someone tell me why Object.isNumber(NaN) returns TRUE ??
Shouldnt this be false ??
EMoreth
--~--~-~--~~~---~--~~
You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups
Prototype: Core group.
To post to this group, send email to prototype
14 matches
Mail list logo
