I'm getting more and more convinced that extra magic such as classMethods
and aliasMethods are unnecessary. You guys are making some great points.
Keeping it simple is best.
+1 for sup() ... very low risk of naming conflict, and no ugly symbol (I
won't go a far as saying bad design, but it
This is good stuff! I think the syntax is just about perfect, and even
though it doesn't involve inheritance, I *love* that I'll be able to pass a
hash of methods directly to Class.create() (or Class.extend()).
I'm perfectly happy using this.parent() since super is reserved. I can't
think of
be an
addition of unnecessary code, IMHO.
On 6/18/07, Adam McCrea [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
So sorry to beat this dead horse, but I just want to weigh in my
thoughts on this before it gets shot down. I agree that $ should only be a
light wrapper around getElementById, but unfortunately getElementById
Oh, if only we all had the luxury to change our sources. ;-)
On 6/17/07, Mislav Marohnić [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
On 6/17/07, Andrew Dupont [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
return $(document.body).down('*[id=foo]');
Nice. But there is an alternative that Tobie suggested: not fixing the
issue.
