Yeah, it is a bit difficult to understand. I've searched the web for
explanations and have even discovered inconsistent explanations. Here
is how I understand it.
The position of the returned elements have to equal an+b for every n >=
0. This is because the nth-child selector is supposed to
I was playing around with the testing framework and decided to see if I
could get it working with Opera and appeared to be successful. But when
I ran the tests, opera failed the dom, form, position, and selector
tests. Is prototype supposed to support Opera?
Trevan
P.S. I submitted a patch
I don't know what you've done so far in this aspect but I looked into
a few tests (Opera 9, Windows XP).
testFormActivating: passed for me
testFormRequest
All three errors that this test throws are caused by a problem with
hasAttribute('method'). It looks like if you don't specify a method
for
On Mar 17, 2:57 am, Christophe Porteneuve <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> OK, start by using the latest version, OK?
D'oh! Google has failed me!
Both questions answered.
On Mar 17, 3:31 am, Trevan Richins <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> (position-b)/a >= n (only if (position-b)/a is an integer - no
Andrew Dupont wrote:
>> This site might be useful:http://gallery.theopalgroup.com/selectoracle/
>
> I'd found that site as well, but it seems to get stuff wrong. If I ask
> it to explain "ul>li:nth-child(n+2)," it replies with:
>
Wow, I didn't notice that one.
The parseNth code looks better.
This is what I came up with for the XPath version: http://pastie.caboo.se/47671
It's a direct port of the logic of parseNth (albeit not yet tested).
I'll look at yours and see if it makes more sense, though.
Cheers,
Andrew
On Mar 17, 4:51 pm, Trevan Richins <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> Andrew D
