This is what I came up with for the XPath version: http://pastie.caboo.se/47671
It's a direct port of the logic of parseNth (albeit not yet tested). I'll look at yours and see if it makes more sense, though. Cheers, Andrew On Mar 17, 4:51 pm, Trevan Richins <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > Andrew Dupont wrote: > >> This site might be useful:http://gallery.theopalgroup.com/selectoracle/ > > > I'd found that site as well, but it seems to get stuff wrong. If I ask > > it to explain "ul>li:nth-child(n+2)," it replies with: > > Wow, I didn't notice that one. > > The parseNth code looks better. I'm wondering, though, how you are > going to convert it to Xpath? This is what I came up > with:http://pastie.caboo.se/47653. It is similar to the patch I submitted in > the original bug but is slightly more condensed. > > It first reduces the selection to the elements that fit the "bth item > from groups of a". Then, in the resulting selection, it grabs the > elements that have a position (in this new selection, not the original > one) that are >= b/a (for a > 0) or <= b/a (for a < 0). > > Trevan --~--~---------~--~----~------------~-------~--~----~ You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups "Prototype: Core" group. To post to this group, send email to [email protected] To unsubscribe from this group, send email to [EMAIL PROTECTED] For more options, visit this group at http://groups.google.com/group/prototype-core?hl=en -~----------~----~----~----~------~----~------~--~---
