Hello kangax thank you for your input
I am using the version scriptaculous-js-1.8.1
I probe with your example and continues to give me the same mistake
On 7 jun, 22:12, kangax <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> Are you using 1.6+ ?
> The correct syntax for defining a "class" has changed since 1.5:
>
>
Hi,
Check it carefully for typos. For instance, your original had
> ReadHash.prototyte = {
Where you probably meant
> ReadHash.prototype = {
Of course, this will have changed anyway if you're updating things in
line with Kangax's help; I'm just saying, if it's not working, perhaps
there'
On Sun, Jun 8, 2008 at 9:43 AM, aljvilla <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>
> Hello kangax thank you for your input
> I am using the version scriptaculous-js-1.8.1
> I probe with your example and continues to give me the same mistake
Hi aljvilla,
Kangax didn't ask you for the version of script.aculo.
It's interesting to note that in JavaScript version 1.7, array
comprehensions allows you do achieve this kind of 'filling' of your
arrays.
E.g.
function range(begin, end) {
for (let i = begin; i < end; ++i) {
yield i;
}
};
var n = [0 for each (i in range(0,20))]
// [0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,
Hello,
I have been trying for days o understand what I have missed.
I have narrowed down the problem to this, where I create a simple class
'foo' that I extend to assign a private member 'name' set to 'FOO':
var foo = Class.create({});
Object.extend( foo, { name : 'FOO' } );
Then :
Off the top of my head, I'd guess you're using FireFox. I know the JS
engine in FireFox (SpiderMonkey) exposes the name of a function via
the `name` property, however, I don't know whether that property is
mutable.
My guess, from the behaviour of your code, is `name` is not a mutable
prope
Yes Jeff, I'm using Firefox (Linux & FreeBSD plat-forms).
And peering at the source code, one can see that Class.create() defines
an explicit klass() function, hence the 'klass' display.
Apparently, this property in not mutable. Something of a pain :-[
I will be reviewing prtotype's Class.creat
Yep, it's suppose to be read-only
http://developer.mozilla.org/en/docs/Core_JavaScript_1.5_Reference:Global_Objects:Function:name
On Jun 9, 12:31 am, Jeff Watkins <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> Off the top of my head, I'd guess you're using FireFox. I know the JS
> engine in FireFox (SpiderMonkey
